Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/30/2010 6:25:06 AM PDT by cornelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: cornelis

Does “fudge” mean lie?


2 posted on 06/30/2010 6:26:42 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cornelis

Powerline does it again.


4 posted on 06/30/2010 6:29:29 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cornelis; xzins; blue-duncan
It doesn't matter. She could have performed partial birth abortions and she is going to be approved.

The only saving grace is that she is so utterly unqualified to sit on the bench that she will have little, if any, influence over any other justice. She had her head handed to her in her first and only oral argument before the SCOTUS. She was totally unprepared to argue before the SCOTUS and she is totally unprepared to take a seat. She is Obama's "yes" man and when Obama is gone, she is going to be lost.

It is embarrassing that she was even nominated. She will be a continuing embarrassment to the SCOTUS for decades and I think the other justices are going to resent that fact.

6 posted on 06/30/2010 6:37:07 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cornelis

“FUDGED??” Perpetrating a FRAUD is not FUDGING!!! Fudging is a toe crossing the line in bowling.


13 posted on 06/30/2010 7:40:03 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cornelis

I guess all that’s really important to Kagen is that the innocent is being killed.


14 posted on 06/30/2010 8:33:17 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cornelis

Contemptuous.

Kagan should be before the Federal bar explaining herself, rather than the Senate.


16 posted on 06/30/2010 8:51:17 AM PDT by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cornelis
I wonder if the committee has seen this? If they have, they should ask Kegan about it. Even if she fudges her way through it, the question and her answer would be on the record. I do not see how she can be approved, but then the Democrats do have the majority on the committee.
18 posted on 06/30/2010 3:28:07 PM PDT by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: cornelis

What will she do when unconstrained by having to fabricate “evidence” and instead able to freely fabricate decisions?


21 posted on 06/30/2010 6:49:43 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson