Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: garbanzo
most correlations are spurious and/or non-causal.

How could you know? IMHO, our ability to intuitively correlate, often with very imperfect knowledge, is what makes us great guessers. I think most human correlations (where there is smoke, there is fire) are likely to be correct. However, we also need to be humble and we need to try to begin to understand our limitations and our tendencies toward hubris and self-deceit.

28 posted on 07/01/2010 9:49:44 PM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Theophilus
How could you know?

Highly simplified bayesian analysis. The universe of causal relationships is a subset of the universe of predictive relationships. The universe of predictive relationship (correlations) tends towards infinity. The universe of causal relationships is finite. Thus the likelihood that a predictive relationship is also a causal one is rather small and most correlations therefore are *probably* non-causal. Think of it as a Venn diagram where casual relationships are a tiny circle inside a much much larger circle of predictive relationships. Randomly throwing darts at the circle, you're much more likely to land outside the inner circle than inside it.

29 posted on 07/01/2010 10:12:08 PM PDT by garbanzo (Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson