Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chief: Cops enforcing SB 1070 are sure to be accused of profiling
Arizona Daily Star ^ | Brian J. Pedersen, Arizona Daily Star, and Howard Fischer, Capitol Media Services

Posted on 07/02/2010 12:13:42 PM PDT by SandRat

PHOENIX - Police officers were warned Thursday that they probably will be accused of racial profiling when they enforce the state's new immigration law, no matter what they do.

The caution was issued by Tucson Police Chief Roberto Villaseñor in a training video released by the Arizona Police Officers Standards and Training Board. It spells out what officers should look for to determine if there is "reasonable suspicion" to believe someone they've stopped for other reasons is in this country illegally. SB 1070 is set to take effect July 29.

Villaseñor, who has been critical of the law, said all his officers will get the message on how to properly enforce the law, but at a cost, because he will have to pay them overtime to watch the 90-minute video and take part in a two- to three-hour discussion and Q&A session.

And Beverly Ginn, an attorney who explains the law, stresses in the video that race, national origin or ethnicity, by law, cannot be used as factors in determining who is legal.

"We will be ready. We will be enforcing this law," Villaseñor said in announcing a series of SB 1070 training sessions. "Once this law is in effect, it will be our obligation to enforce it."

But he cautioned: "Without a doubt, we are going to be accused of racial profiling, no matter what we do on this. The best thing we can do is document thoroughly where we develop our reasonable suspicion or probable cause."

The video warns officers that they will be under very close scrutiny.

"On one side are people who are anxious to show that Arizona officers will racially profile Hispanic people under this new law," warned Lyle Mann, the state board's executive director. "Officers should expect to have field tests set up by activists who want to catch you in conduct they believe will help their causes."

But Mann also noted the law allows any legal resident of the state to sue over any policy that restricts or limits the ability of police to enforce federal immigration laws. He said that while it is doubtful a decision by an individual officer would constitute a policy, that would open the door to a suit, and "much is uncertain at this point."

Villaseñor said the Tucson Police Department command staff will be trained Tuesday, and officers will be required to attend one of 17 sessions scheduled between next Friday and July 29. He said TPD will use resources it hadn't budgeted for to pay for the overtime.

The Pima County Sheriff's Department also plans training sessions for its officers, though there are no plans for additional training beyond the video, Capt. Chris Radtke said. Most of what SB 1070 mandates are things his department already does, he said, so the video will serve as a refresher.

"This is not something new to us," he said, noting that the department arrests more illegal immigrants than any other law enforcement agency in Southern Arizona. "We encounter this every day."

Despite efforts to alleviate concerns about racial profiling, critics remain vocal. Jon O'Neill, of the Arizona chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, pointed out the training video is voluntary.

"There is no guarantee that any officer who would be enforcing SB 1070 will see it," he said. O'Neill said his organization won't comment beyond that, because what's in the video is likely to become part of the legal challenge to the law that the ACLU already has filed.

A hearing on that challenge is set for July 22.

In the video, Ginn warns: "The reality is that the ethnic mix of our community is such that race tells you nothing about whether or not a person is unlawfully in the United States," adding that the same is true of ethnicity.

Ginn said the best course for officers to follow is to ask for identification in the circumstances in which they would normally make such a request. She said that if individuals have one of the acceptable forms of ID, including an Arizona driver's license, a tribal ID card or another document that requires proof of legal presence in the country to obtain, "that's the end of your inquiry."

If someone doesn't have acceptable identification, Ginn said, officers can consider factors such as fleeing, engaging in evasive maneuvers, an inability to provide a home address, or having a foreign vehicle registration.

Location also is a factor, she said, with police being allowed to consider whether the person is in an area where illegal immigrants regularly gather and look for work. And she said how a person is dressed or an inability to speak English can be among the factors considered.

Although she didn't elaborate, Hippolito Acosta, a former federal immigration officer who is now a consultant, said clothing inconsistent with weather conditions might indicate a recent arrival in the area. And while not speaking English, by itself, is not enough, it can contribute to other factors.

No matter how closely officers follow the guidelines, Villaseñor believes they're going to be accused of profiling.

"I think the public's perception and the public's interpretation of racial profiling are going to increase," Villaseñor said. "I am absolutely certain there are going to be accusations of racial profiling, no matter what we do."

And because the law requires verification of legal status only when "reasonably practicable," Villaseñor said he is telling his officers to use their judgment to decide if there is something more important they should be doing.

Contact reporter Brian J. Pedersen at bjp@azstarnet.com or 573-4242.


TOPICS: Government; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: aliens; enforcement; police; sb1070
To watch the video or for other information from the Police Officers Standards and Training Board about SB 1070 enforcement, go to www.azpost.state.az.us/SB1070infocenter.htm
1 posted on 07/02/2010 12:13:49 PM PDT by SandRat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SandRat

If any case goes to court and the driver didn’t have plates or a license, then the case should be thrown out summarily.

I live in colorado and I see cars all of the time without plates, and nothing is ever done about, no in-transit signs, no plates, no nothing, and our no nothing mayors are doing nothign about it.


2 posted on 07/02/2010 12:17:13 PM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
They're already being accused of it anyway, and the bill hasn't even gone into effect yet.

It amazes me that when accused of "profiling"...no one ever says "prove it".

It's just another version of "racist", and that has lost a lot of its zing too.

I say arrest them all and let the liberals sort them out.
3 posted on 07/02/2010 12:19:59 PM PDT by FrankR ( If we don't stand up to tyranny, the tyrants win, and we're enslaved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

They have frequently been accused of profiling or racism well prior to SB 1070. A recent accusation by a black city councilman against a Phoenix police officer made huge headlines. The councilman was “forcefully” pushed to the ground and then removed from the scene of an active fire after being told repeatedly to get away from the house. The rantings from the councilman went unanswered by the police department while they conducted their “investigation” of his claims. A few weeks later the councilman “apologized” for the bad behavior exhibited by all involved parties. The “victims” are just waiting to pounce.


4 posted on 07/02/2010 12:24:17 PM PDT by ScoopAmma (We are led by the Resident -in Chief; aka part-time member of Webelo Troop 44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat
When the FedGov posts signs like these isn't that a form of profiling?

Gov. Brewer to President Obama ...(Must see video)

Posting signs like these has legal implications that go straight to the heart of American sovereignty. 0baMao has asserted that southern Arizona has been ceded to Mexico.

5 posted on 07/02/2010 12:30:14 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

h.mmm....Ah’m surprised these signs haven’t been....ahem “ventilated properly” to allow the desert wind to blow ....


6 posted on 07/02/2010 12:32:02 PM PDT by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mo

Indeed. I think the pic was taken very shortly after it was installed.


7 posted on 07/02/2010 12:38:12 PM PDT by TigersEye (Greenhouse Theory is false. Totally debunked. "GH gases" is a non-sequitur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

It amazes me that when accused of “profiling”...no one ever says “prove it”.

Maricopa County Sheriffs do and more.

Maricopa County Sheriffs Office: Mayor Gordon You’re ignorant, Shut up!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKuOA-vc_v0


8 posted on 07/02/2010 12:48:17 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ScoopAmma

Sheiff Joe’s Deputies hit back.

Maricopa County Sheriffs Office: Mayor Gordon You’re ignorant, Shut up!!! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKuOA-vc_v0


9 posted on 07/02/2010 12:51:20 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

I was waiting for him to say “Phil, you ignorant slut” ala the Gilda Radner era. That would have been the icing on the proverbial cake!


10 posted on 07/02/2010 1:00:01 PM PDT by ScoopAmma (We are led by the Resident -in Chief; aka part-time member of Webelo Troop 44)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

What a new and novel thing, for police to be called bad things just for doing their jobs. How ever will they cope?


11 posted on 07/02/2010 1:21:48 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

What’s wrong with “racial profiling”? Anyone charged with border enforcement had better be profiling, and they’re ineffective wusses if they aren’t. To Hell with the PC nannys.


12 posted on 07/02/2010 1:57:36 PM PDT by dtrpscout (A bad dog is better than most good people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

HA!
Easy defense!

1-Upon arrest, determine citizenship.
2-Get a conviction on the originating crime.
3-After completing the sentence, deport non-citizens, or extend sentence for being here illeglly.

It’s only profiling if there was no “probable cause” in the first place.


13 posted on 07/02/2010 1:57:36 PM PDT by G Larry (Democrats: expediting the Destruction of America, before they lose power...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

Profiling. Whuch, of course, is nothing but COMMON SENSE. If 90% of illegals are Mexicans, why in the hell would you look for blond haired, blue eyed 6’6” Swedes???


14 posted on 07/02/2010 1:59:47 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

Ping!


15 posted on 07/02/2010 3:52:50 PM PDT by HiJinx (John 10:1 - He who enters not by the gate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

“Tucson Police Chief Roberto Villaseñor”

Unfortunately the name says it all. I am very concerned about a portion of Latinos that are in positions of power, ie. congressman, judges, police chiefs, etc., that are showing more allegiance to Latinos and Mexico rather than to America and the rule of law. Even the highly touted “conservative” Marco Rubio opposed Arizonas immigration law. Along with this comes their suseptability to be corrupted by the drug cartels.


16 posted on 07/04/2010 10:55:52 AM PDT by doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc
When they fail to enforce the law get their Badge number and name and file an official complaint with the police disciplinary board for willful derelicticion of duty against them. If you have hard evidence especially video that's not a complaint that they want to have on the record and could end up being a career ending disciplinary action for them.
17 posted on 07/04/2010 3:36:25 PM PDT by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

The most likely scenario for what you are talking about would probably be a traffic accident.


18 posted on 07/04/2010 3:59:03 PM PDT by USNBandit (sarcasm engaged at all times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson