To: kbennkc
If we believe in the presumption of innocence, even for cops, which I do, sorta, what is the risk harm by letting this officer keep working?
____________________________________________________________
There is little question of his guilt if he was caught there. There is also a high probability that he is corrupt and the services rendered were not paid for him by cash, but rather by him “looking the other way.”
4 posted on
07/03/2010 10:47:22 AM PDT by
Mere Survival
(The time to fight was yesterday, but now will have to do.)
To: Mere Survival
There is little question of his guilt if he was caught there. There is also a high probability that he is corrupt and the services rendered were not paid for him by cash, but rather by him “looking the other way.” You forgot sarcasm tags. I know every Freeper believes in the Constitution./sarc
5 posted on
07/03/2010 10:57:44 AM PDT by
kbennkc
(For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
To: Mere Survival
I don’t think he is harmed by not working. It’s not like he is being imprisoned.
Sort of like a child abuse allegation.
If guilty, he is obviously abusing the public trust. If not, it did not harm him to take administrative leave.
14 posted on
07/03/2010 11:57:24 AM PDT by
Persevero
(What students would learn in American schools above all is the religion of Jesus Christ - G. Wash.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson