Have you? Glenn stated that he was holding and reading the ORIGINAL copy, not a typed, posted, marked-up version on the internet. You can NOT say that Glenn is wrong unless you have seen the original which he (and Mr. Barton) says specifically reads as he stated on his show.
Stating something like that does not make it so. Considering the boy couldn't be bothered to Google "Dead Sea Scrolls" makes me question any research he claims.
Any historian knows to check their primary sources and that there are several online sites that are accurate in posting typed, marked up versions of primary sources.
BTW 'original copy' is an oxymoron.
“Have you?”
Nope, but I am not on here basically calling people liars without having seen the actual evidence.
Please note that I am simply pointing out that the link that was given leads to a typed, marked version which does NOT make it correct.