This is the most incredibly twisted stuff I've ever read.
Pro-Life Ping
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
It’s from the pits of hell.
Killing for the right to kill? That certainly takes no moral courage, rather, total depravity.
Another example of twisted, perverted thinking that originates in the bowels of the devil himself.
I have never understood the logic of this argument. If what they say is true, why should the rules change at birth. They should continue to apply until at least the beginning of first grade. If before that first day of school, a woman’s need for autonomy or self esteem, etc., etc. becomes threatened, then the little tyke should be done in, terminated, wished into the cornfield, ground up into fertilizer. What’s the difference?
She gets close to a pro-Life realisation of what an unborn baby is, and then tortures herself into a killing rationalisation.
There is hope for this woman, just as there was for the leader of Planned Parenthood. Keep praying for her, FReepers!
This person is a raving lunatic — and very possibly a danger to her own child.
Just my opinion of course.
Satan comes out from hiding...
All demagogues sneak an unsupported conclusion at the end: having plowed through the rest of the text, the reader gets a feeling that this is merely a conclusion of a well-exposited argument. This a trick of many scoundrels (Pat Buchanan is particularly fond of it).
The supposed implication "If you are willing to die... you must be prepared to kill" has the same structure as "if you are sleepy, you must also eat;" or, "if you are willing to go to college, you must be willing to take guitar lessons, too."
Is any explication necessary to show that this is nonsense? The shear stupidity of the author is breathtaking.
She is basing her whole argument on the commonplace liberal idea that the end justifies the means.
And in this case, the “means” is killing of unborn children.
SICK.
Even Uncle Joe only killed "as long as it was necessary."
She's right, though, you know. She's just killing the wrong people. The babies have nothing to do with it; she should be honest and go after the men.
Trouble with that is, we would fight back.
God, these people are shameless.
Proof that the pro-death cultists are primarily motivated by envy of God. “Autonomy”, “Freedom”, “In control”, etc are the key words.
“I own myself so I can do whatever I want; I serve no one, I am God to myself” etc.
Of course, this also includes being “God” over others so it’s okay to kill them, too. Playing God always leads to kiling other people.
I can't help but think that her position is so nonsensical that she will have to change it before long. If she has finally figured out that abortion is killing, she may well be on the path toward being pro-life.
What a wonderful world these people are creating. Everyone must sacrifice life and happiness so that YOU can be in control and do what YOU want.
No wonder they hate the gospel of Jesus so much. He was all about laying everything down for others.
Perhaps that’s the center of the reason for all the hatred.
Antonia Senior sees a “necessity” of killing innocent babies, but no mention of Sharia Law. She’s as gutless as she is heartless.
By the way, the key word is really murder, rather than kill. She’s a sick woman.
Stuff like this makes me wonder if the coming Muslim domination of the UK is punishment for abandoning Christian morals. The Druids used to sacrifice their youths to appease their gods as the Romans took over the British isles. Didn’t work for the Druids then and it won’t work now.