Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bcsco
I suspect they didn’t include discrimination because the law hasn’t gone into affect yet, and there are no victims that can be named.

I suspect they are making as simple an argument as possible. Pre-emption. The more complicated they make the claims, the more opportunity for a defense lawyer to poke holes in it with the Constitution and the harder for any Judge to rule in favor.

Specifically on the discrimination angle, any argument about profiling or discrimination would open the door to the defense to argue illegals do not have the civil rights afforded US Citizens.

29 posted on 07/07/2010 7:55:52 AM PDT by IamConservative (Liberty, guns and ammo; all a good man needs to succeed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: IamConservative

That’s what I was getting at. You just said it far better. Thanks.


30 posted on 07/07/2010 8:01:31 AM PDT by bcsco (First there was Slick Willie. Now there's "Oil Slick" Barry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson