Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IRS.GOV "If You File A Fraudulent Return, Keep Tax Records Indefinitely..." (
IRS ^ | 7 July 2010 | Robert A Cook

Posted on 07/08/2010 8:14:31 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE

The following are the IRS official record retention requirements. Please remember to follow them explicitly when you file a fraudulent tax return; or if you forget to file a tax return, remember to file your records indefinitely.

"Note: Keep copies of your filed tax returns. They help in preparing future tax returns and making computations if you file an amended return.

1. You owe additional tax and situations (2), (3), and (4), below, do not apply to you; keep records for 3 years.

2. You do not report income that you should report, and it is more than 25% of the gross income shown on your return; keep records for 6 years.

3. You file a fraudulent return; keep records indefinitely.

4. You do not file a return; keep records indefinitely.

5. You file a claim for credit or refund* after you file your return; keep records for 3 years from the date you filed your original return or 2 years from the date you paid the tax, whichever is later.

6. You file a claim for a loss from worthless securities or bad debt deduction; keep records for 7 years.

7. Keep all employment tax records for at least 4 years after the date that the tax becomes due or is paid, whichever is later.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: duh; irs; oblivious; wtf
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: skeeter

I don’t think you completely understand what constitutes felony tax evasion. We’re not talking about typos or math errors, or forgetting to sign your return.


21 posted on 07/08/2010 8:41:58 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

What I don’t understand is your point.


22 posted on 07/08/2010 8:42:31 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
1. You don't have to keep any records at all (if you are worried about incriminating yourself),
2. If your records incriminate you, the IRS already has them, and
3. If you engage in felony tax evasion and intend to "play stupid," get ready to pay your attorney a handsome sum.
23 posted on 07/08/2010 8:46:51 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

If you set out to commit a felony, you should probably be aware of the law.

Just because you’re aware of the law, doesn’t mean you
haven’t committed a felony.


24 posted on 07/08/2010 8:51:10 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nervous Tick

My question would be how exactly the IRS defines “fraudulent”. ;-)


Simple. If you are accused of some kind of underpayment from long ago, and you tel the IRS you don’t have the records, they allege fraud.


25 posted on 07/08/2010 8:57:06 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Anything worth doing, is worth doing badly at first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tet68
Right, that's for the government to prove beyond a reasonable doubt (and they won't need your records to do so).
26 posted on 07/08/2010 8:57:17 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

Just another of the Feds saying, “We own you...literally.”


27 posted on 07/08/2010 8:57:19 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
If you are accused of some kind of underpayment from long ago, and you tel the IRS you don’t have the records, they allege fraud.

That's pure BS.

28 posted on 07/08/2010 8:58:18 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

The IRS must be just foolin’ with this ‘retention requirements’ stuff.


29 posted on 07/08/2010 8:58:26 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE

after 3 years, you should still save a copy of your 1040 and a cancelled check or copy of refund check.

It proves you filed. They cannot audit for errors after that point, but you have to prove you filed.


30 posted on 07/08/2010 8:58:26 AM PDT by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: campaignPete R-CT

Please tell me your a tax attorney. My garage isn’t nearly large enough.


31 posted on 07/08/2010 9:01:43 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Back to the first dime you earned selling lemonade.

Oh, and any side bets that keeping records longer than 3 years will be regarded as prima facie evidence that you were defrauding the IRS?

32 posted on 07/08/2010 9:01:54 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 530 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

No, the IRS will build its case against you without needing you to incriminate yourself . . . this is simply the IRS’ way of warning you that, if you plan on doing something it thinks is shady, be prepared to defend yourself.


All the IRS needs to do is say you knowingly overstated your deductions 8 years ago. You have tossed all the supporting evidence, and have no way to counter the fraud charge.


33 posted on 07/08/2010 9:03:49 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Anything worth doing, is worth doing badly at first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
I've seen people lose cases because they failed to keep records. (But that's because they couldn't defend themselves properly).

I remember one guy who claimed (in a non-criminal case) that he never received any of the IRS' letters (some of which were sent registered mail). The IRS attorney said, "but you opened, cashed, and deposited all of your refund checks within days." The guy lost on that argument.

34 posted on 07/08/2010 9:04:49 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba
All the IRS needs to do is say you knowingly overstated your deductions 8 years ago.

Not "say," but prove. Beyond a reasonable doubt. In federal court.

35 posted on 07/08/2010 9:06:33 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

“To” + “Get” + “Her” = “Together”


36 posted on 07/08/2010 9:06:53 AM PDT by null and void (We are now in day 530 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I don’t think you completely understand what constitutes felony tax evasion. We’re not talking about typos or math errors, or forgetting to sign your return.


No, but it’s easy for the IRS to charge that an alleged understatement of income or overstatement of expenses/deductions was “knowingly,” and you’re in criminal “fraud” territory, just because they decided to allege it.

Presumably, they’d prefer to have some kind of smoking gun corroboration, like a “scheme” between two people, or a second set of books, or other evidence that has no explanation other than intention. But your error can still be alleged as intentional, and they have one hell of a bargaining chip when negotiating a settlement of plea.


37 posted on 07/08/2010 9:07:29 AM PDT by Atlas Sneezed (Anything worth doing, is worth doing badly at first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Oh, and any side bets that keeping records longer than 3 years will be regarded as prima facie evidence that you were defrauding the IRS?

How much? I need the money.

38 posted on 07/08/2010 9:07:44 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Beelzebubba

Any competent tax attorney can take that bargaining chip right off the table. Heck, I could do it. “Show me your cards.”


39 posted on 07/08/2010 9:10:13 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Not "say," but prove. Beyond a reasonable doubt. In federal court.

I'm sure its possible for a taxpayer to win such a case against a prosecutor with all the resources of the state at his disposal.

But I'd bet it'd feel alot like losing.

40 posted on 07/08/2010 9:12:24 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson