It took me 15 seconds to find the photograph:
(It's at http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/graphics/martyr.jpg if your browser doesn't load it for some reason)
It appears to be completely innocent, but at the same time is amazingly insensitive.
The Houston Chronicle had the same sob story. Neither of the papers printed the sign. That makes me think that it wasn’t as innocent as Mr. Master says.
It took me 15 seconds to find the photograph:
(It's at http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/graphics/martyr.jpg if your browser doesn't load it for some reason)
It appears to be completely innocent, but at the same time is amazingly insensitive.
Phenomenally stupid or a planned provocation?
