Immaculate Deception: Fraud in reporting Obama's birth

July 10, 2010 | None

[Jess Kitting]

Let’s forget for a moment about the allegations that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. is not a naturalized U.S. citizen and examine the incontrovertible facts surrounding the reporting of his mysterious birth in 1961.

• Fact 1: Barack Obama Sr. (the President’s father) was married to another woman (Kezia Aoko) in Africa at the time of Barack Hussein Obama Jr’s birth to Stanley Ann Dunham Obama (the President’s mother).
• Fact 2: In the United States, being married to two women at the same time is illegal. It is the crime of bigamy.
• Fact 3: In 1961 someone placed a birth announcement in the Honolulu Advertiser newspaper declaring the birth of a son to “Mr. and Mrs.” Barack Obama (Sr).
• Fact 4: Stanley Ann Dunham (Barack Jr’s mother) claims to have been married to Barack Obama Sr. at that time. Barack Obama Jr. also claims that his parents were married and later divorced.

  The facts raise several interesting questions:

• 1. Did Barack Obama Sr. inform Stanley Ann Dunham of his concurrent marriage to the woman in Africa? (If not, he committed fraud as well as bigamy.)
• 2. Did Stanley Ann Dunham marry Barack Obama Sr. knowing he was already married to another woman? (If so, they were both fraudulent.)
• 3. Did Stanley Ann’s parents know about the first wife and approve of the marriage of their daughter to an already married man? (If so, they were involved in fraud too.)
• 4. Were Barack Obama Sr and Stanley Ann Dunham really married? If not, the placement of the birth announcement of “their son” in the Honolulu Advertiser was fraudulent—unless, of course, the “Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama (Sr)” was referring to Mr. Obama and his first wife, in which case, Barack Obama Jr. is not really Stanley Ann Dunham’s child.
• 5. Does Barack Hussein Obama Jr know about the circumstances surrounding the fraudulent reporting of his birth? If so, that may explain his reluctance to come forward with details about it and his propensity to hide the truth whenever anyone questions his background.

[Jess Kitting]

Let's start with the facts and see where they lead us.

[FES0844]

Where is Woodward when you need him!

[Diogenesis]

[P-Marlowe]

Where is Woodward when you need him!

Trust me if GWB had been born in El Paso anywhere near the border, they would have moved heaven and earth to show that he was born in Mexico. In fact, they would have gladly deeded GWB's actual birthplace to Mexico and then started impeachment proceedings the next day.

[Nepeta]

Obama could have been born on Mars to Martian parents, and he would still get a pass.

[Liz]

"ALOHA"

[Cheetahcat]

Rules do not apply to the fatherless one and he will use the jump the broom defense.

[Liz]

[Vaquero]

FACTS!!!

the disciples of the messiah cares not for facts. Read that as not only the MSM, but also moderately conservative media and even some so called far right right pundits like Rush who have decided to, at least for the time being, avoid connection with birthers or even the whole gay-obama people.

The reason? they feel that reaction would be so strongly negative against them that it would poison the well on what they're trying to prove.....by condemning the POSOTUS for what he is doing to America.

I do not know if that is the right technique or not...it is what it is.

[17th Miss Regt]

Let’s forget for a moment about the allegations that Barack Hussein Obama Jr. is not a naturalized U.S. citizen

That is not the correct question. The correct question is whether he is a natural born citizen as required by Article I of the Constitution. There is a big difference.

[Cousin Eddie]

This is why birthers are ridiculous. Who cares whether his parents were legally married? Illegitimate birth has nothing to do with the qualifications to be president, especially in this country.

[xzins]

they have Pres Bush’s birth certificate, military record, school records, ACT/SAT scores, business records, and they probably have a log of every minute of every day of his life.

Compare that to what we have about Obama?

SAT: nope

ACT: nope

LSAT: nope

college transcripts: nope

military records: (You’ve got to be kidding)

birth certificate: nope

[ThePatriotsFlag]

Interesting Post. For anyone needing references, I've been keeping a list of links for you at The Patriot's Flag - Eligibility and Credibility. Each link has a full summary using a "mouse over". I've mostly kept this for my own reference. But as you look at all the links and what they are saying, birther or not, something is terribly wrong. And the post for this thread just adds more interesting ideas. (And it is now added to the links I'm keeping).

[Mortrey]

“Immaculate Deception”.

I LIKE your title....makes me think of Rush always using the term “the Immaculation of Barak Obama..”

hmmmmm....might make one think Rush knows more than he’s letting on......

[goldfinch]

Bluntly, none of the facts you have listed have anything to do with Barack Obama’s being eligible for the Presidency. It doesn't matter if his parents were married or not...and I have long thought the reason he did not produce his birth certificate is because it would reveal his parents were not married. I can't get too excited about the coverup, way back 50 years ago. There was a stigma against out of wedlock births back then, so the birth announcement might have softened that a little. In any case, Obama was far to young to have anything to do with it...it was more likely his mother or his grandparents.

[P-Marlowe]

Compare that to what we have about Obama?

That's why we call him ZERO.

[rovenstinez]

But, isn’t this the most transparent Administration in modern history?

[17th Miss Regt]

Trust me if GWB had been born in El Paso anywhere near the border, they would have moved heaven and earth to show that he was born in Mexico. In fact, they would have gladly deeded GWB's actual birthplace to Mexico and then started impeachment proceedings the next day.

Well, Texas was a part of Mexico way back when and the Mexicans have always claimed that Texas was taken unfairly from them by the Americans. So if the Dems were willing to give up the southwest they could cede it and then start proceedings. (Never mind the fact that Texas was a separate nation for about 10 years before joining the US - facts don't matter.)

[Jess Kitting]

Let's forget for a moment. . . just for a moment, so that we can look into other things, such as why Obama is so secretive about his birth and why he tries so hard to hide the truth about so many things.

I think this question, why Obama and the people around him have a propensity to deceive, is an important one. We can come back (or get to) the constitutional issues at a later time. Hey, they could even be related. (Smile.)

[P-Marlowe]

I have a feeling that the democrats would be willing to cede Alaska back to Russia in order to ensure that Sarah Palin is never sworn in as president.