Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sonofstrangelove

I am recalling the first complaints about the M16 from our boys in Viet Nam - that is when they started to chrome the chambers. Why dont we have an american version of the FN?

Accurate and mud proof.


12 posted on 07/11/2010 6:01:47 AM PDT by kingcoal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: kingcoal
Why dont we have an american version of the FN?

1. Who wants to put the money in developing something they can't sell to the public.
2.We don't have an industrial infrastructure anymore.

17 posted on 07/11/2010 11:27:48 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: kingcoal
I am recalling the first complaints about the M16 from our boys in Viet Nam - that is when they started to chrome the chambers. Why dont we have an american version of the FN?

Accurate and mud proof.

Reasonably accurate for a service rifle, but heavy, almost 12 pounds loaded. And though reasonably reliable in mud, not as happy with sandyb conditions, as the Israeli troops who used the things from the 1950s until the mid-1970s found out. They called besom the broom, and though the Israelis adopted the *sand cuts* on the bolt and bolt carrier as used by the British on their L1A1 version, there was a lot more sand in their area of operations than those sand cuts could digest.

I like the FAL, don't misunderstand me. But I'd far rather carry the Rhodesiam R1 version than the T48.


20 posted on 07/11/2010 12:26:21 PM PDT by archy (Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson