Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gondring

There is a moral difference between a person who has “died,” and a person who has been murdered for their organs.

And my chosen parallel is exact. Skin is an organ, and embryonic stem cells are the pluripotent cells that, if not ghoulishly “harvested,” would have made up the organs of the child.


23 posted on 07/11/2010 8:23:22 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (No matter who you think you are, God retains His pardon and veto powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
There is a moral difference between a person who has “died,” and a person who has been murdered for their organs.

Indeed.

So by your reasoning, it would be okay to even use recent embryos that were being discarded. (Note that none are being destroyed expressly for the purpose of harvesting.)

25 posted on 07/11/2010 8:38:22 PM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson