Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Most Transparent Administration Ever Makes Effective Reporting from Gulf a Felony
newsbusters ^ | 7/12/10 | Lachlan Markay

Posted on 07/12/2010 2:56:42 PM PDT by Nachum

Effectively reporting on the Gulf oil spill is now a Class D felony, punishable by a fine of up to $40,000. That's right, the most transparent administration in history has made it a felony, effective July 1, to get within 65 feet of what the Coast Guard determines are essential recovery efforts. According to Anderson Cooper, officials tried to up that number to 300 feet. Cooper, who claimed federal officials prevented CNN on two occasions from taking photographs in the gulf, seemed frustrated when he reported on the new laws the day they went into effect.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: administration; felony; reporting; transparent
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: Nachum

21 posted on 07/12/2010 4:57:46 PM PDT by conservativeimage (We are done electing disappointing compromisers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Muttley Laugh
22 posted on 07/12/2010 6:31:55 PM PDT by musicman (Until I see the REAL Long Form Vault BC, he's just "PRES__ENT" Obama = Without "ID")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Nachum; Tax-chick; Anoreth; mizuki san; LibreOuMort; NicknamedBob; Monkey Face
That's right, the most transparent administration in history has made it a felony, effective July 1, to get within 65 feet of what the Coast Guard determines are essential recovery efforts.

Greenpeace take notice, a precedent has been set.

But let's be blunt; 65 feet, 23 yards, isn't much. FELONY? I take complete issue with that, but as a hobby photographer even my little 6MB pocket camera (the one I have pretty with me much all the time) would get all the photos I'd need to antagonize this administration.

Even without its silly little 3x optical zoom.

This issue looks more like a non-interference issue, because it really doesn't restrict photographers. There may be something else involved but I don't know what it is.

Is Al-Qaida planning to attack CG ships?? They might have to deal with Anoreth and in such a battle I'd bet all on Anoreth.

23 posted on 07/12/2010 6:40:09 PM PDT by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|Remember Neda Agha-Soltan|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Must be
24 posted on 07/12/2010 8:45:57 PM PDT by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Think of the photographers pursuing Princess Di, *smash*. 65 feet is across the street to the crazy cat lady’s house, and that’s pretty close to a boat working with heavy equipment. It’s certainly not going to prevent someone with a real camera, as opposed to my pocket Nikon, from taking pictures. It might prevent a collision, injuries, deaths.

Anoreth says they’ve practiced “small boat attack” drill in the Pacific. I would not discount the possibility of enviro-radicals attacking or attempting to disrupt operations in the Gulf of Mexico.


25 posted on 07/13/2010 3:14:21 AM PDT by Tax-chick (We made a proactive decision to postpone the originally scheduled nightlife activities.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson