Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: All
Again, from the guy who's been blathering on about ad hominems all day. You're just a fountain of irony! Kinda like your hack "expert" with his internet degree sticking up for a bunch of hack cops with their own internet degrees.

Again you don't seem to know what an Ad Hominem fallacy actually is. BTW: I noticed that you completely ignored Dr. Andrew Welchman and his team from the University of Birmingham. You've also never once addressed the fact of human response time. Instead, you've continued your libel against Dr. Lewinski and several regionally accredited schools. That appears to be all that you have.

You are your own echo chamber. You hate the police so bad, and are so committed to that irrational belief, you will ignore anything that contradicts that belief, even in the slightest.

That's not science... That's delusion.

491 posted on 07/13/2010 10:23:32 PM PDT by freedomwarrior998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 488 | View Replies ]


To: freedomwarrior998
Hint: It isn't "libel" if it's TRUE and the truth is, the so-called "Dr." Lewinski is an unqualified hack who bought himself a degree off the internet.

Do you think I've misrepresented him? Well, fallacy boy, here's your chance to prove me wrong. Show me Lewinski's real doctorate - not the fake one in a shady, uncredentialed, unapproved discipline that he appears to have largely made up himself. Show me his work at a real university with real classes and a real psychology program, not some online degree mill that he gave his credit card to so he could take "distance learning" courses. Show me where his work has been peer reviewed and published in an outlet that he doesn't own himself. Honestly - I'd love to see it if it exists!

518 posted on 07/14/2010 5:33:27 AM PDT by conimbricenses (Red means run son, numbers add up to nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]

To: freedomwarrior998
BTW: I noticed that you completely ignored Dr. Andrew Welchman and his team from the University of Birmingham.

Apparently literacy is not your strong suit either:

"We placed pairs of participants in competition with each other to make a series of button presses. Within-subject analysis of movement times revealed a 10 per cent benefit for ****reactive**** actions. This was maintained when opponents performed dissimilar actions, and when participants competed against a computer, suggesting that the effect is not related to facilitation produced by action observation. Rather, faster ballistic movements may be a general property of ****reactive**** motor control, potentially providing a useful means of promoting survival."

In other words, it suggests the exact opposite of Lewinski's claims. That's because it was done by a team of real scientists.

541 posted on 07/14/2010 10:05:07 AM PDT by conimbricenses (Red means run son, numbers add up to nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson