Posted on 07/13/2010 1:17:51 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
When former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin signed a contract in January to become a regular guest on Fox News, many of her critics said it was part of a strategy by the Republican to avoid tough or skeptical questions and engage only with friendly members of the media.
But Bill O’Reilly appears to have missed that memo.
The larger-than-life Fox News host with the top rated cable news show on TV has a history of challenging Palin. “You don’t have that much experience,” he told the former governor last fall, though he has also defended her performance as governor.
But Palin’s two most recent appearances on “The O’Reilly Factor” have drawn notice for the unusually testy exchanges between the TV titan and the most famous conservative political figure in America. This past Friday, O’Reilly interrupted Palin numerous times and pushed her to give an answer on how she would solve the nation’s immigration problem after securing the U.S.-Mexico border.
“Well, again, first let me go back to the importance of securing the border,” Palin said.
“No, no, but we got that, we got that governor,” O’Reilly interjected.
“Mm mm, no we don’t,” Palin countered.
“Yeah, the people watching this program have it. We have it. We assume that you as president would secure the border,” O’Reilly said. “But now you have to look inward, and you’ve got 12 million people staring at you. What are you going to have them do?”
Palin talked generally about not giving illegal immigrants a “free pass” and said, “We’re not going to reward the bad behavior.” She even, when asked what to do with immigrants who don’t register with the government, responded: “You deport ‘em.”
But when O’Reilly pressed her to outline what to do with those who do register for normalization, Palin was either unable or unwilling to answer the question: “Bill, it makes me uncomfortable that we’re even going down that path so far when—”
“You have to go,” O’Reilly interrupted. “You have to go down that path because it’s going to come up.”
“This is where it gets very complicated governor,” O’Reilly said to Palin, who wore an expression that could be described as irritated or bemused.
Jere Hester, a former New York Daily News City Desk Editor who now teaches at CUNY’s School of Journalism, called it “an extraordinary exchange.”
O’Reilly’s quizzing of Palin on how to plug the oil leak in the Gulf of Mexico, during a June 15 interview, was not as tense as the most recent appearance. But O’Reilly did express disbelief at Palin’s argument that Obama was not doing everything he could to stop the gusher.
“I kind of have a big beef with you too though, Bill, if you don’t acknowledge that President Obama is wrong on his call for a need for energy policy,” Palin said.
A spokesman for Palin’s political action committee, SarahPAC, declined to comment. But partisans on both sides of the Palin divide – those who love her and those who hate her – have taken notice.
“Whatever she’s for or not [on immigration], Bill O’Reilly doesn’t seem to have much respect for her ‘insights’ on the subject,” wrote the liberal website Newshounds.us. “For the second time in a few weeks, he virtually destroyed her credibility when she was poised to use his show to boost it.”
But a website with a close association to Palin – Conservatives4Palin.com – lashed out at O’Reilly.
“Mr. O’Reilly prides himself on being fair and balanced. O’Reilly regularly proclaims that when he interviews Governor Palin he’ll be fair without asking her gotcha questions. Well, on Friday night O’Reilly broke his own rule,” said the website.
“Had O’Reilly stopped interrupting her and allowed her to answer his question we would actually have heard what she had to say. Twice the Governor begun explaining her position and O’Reilly rudely interrupted her,” said a post author at Conservatives4Palin named Sheya. “To Bill O’Reilly: Can you PLEASE let Governor Palin finish her sentences so you actually get the ANSWER to your questions. You know, you may learn something in the process.”
Conservatives4Palin.com was started in part by a woman, Rebecca Mansour, who left the site to become a paid Palin consultant. SarahPAC paid Mansour $22,000 from April to June of this year for help with grassroots organizing and with managing Palin’s online presence, largely through her very active Facebook page, according to Federal Election Campaign filings.
A veteran Republican operative, however, said the O’Reilly sessions are good for Palin.
“Bill and Palin make for good TV. He gives her a run for her money and she feels free to give it right back to him,” the GOP official said. “The dynamic is a good one for the network, and it also helps stretch her on policy questions she would not otherwise feel obliged to answer.”
And she seemed to think it was a great idea. She didn't seem to know what to do with them once they'd registered, but she did want them to register.
“How, as a humane, compassionate, sophisticated Nation, do we handle millions of illegal immigrants, who in many ways are integrated into our economy, and somehow also honor our laws, morals, and Freedom?”
Please help me to understand how violation of our immigration laws translates into illegal immigrants “honoring our laws”?
Gads! I HATE that segment! I mean, I like the fact that he is trying to get different words out there, BUT, he uses the same sentence EVERY time. "Do not be..., do not be..., do not be..." Geeeez! Can't he think of some other sentences to construct? What a dope! I even wrote him asking him to use a different sentence once in a while. He probably never even read it - or, if he did, he just ignored it.
####
Indeed! Huge Bump.
And your positions do not vacillate with the slightest breeze. Intelligent people base their stable, unchanging bedrock values, and thus their political orientation, on years of reading, studying, life experiences and other human interactions.
The so-called moderate, the “independent” voter are vastly overrated in importance.
That's just as easy. We handle them by SELF DEPORTATION. Simple. Make it hard for them to get the jobs, the schooling, the health care, etc. and viola! They self-deport. BUT, ALL the States have to do that. Can't make it easy for them to run to another State - that's just self defeating.
O'Reilly is a stealth commie pretending to be an independent.
He's a commie public school teacher union member, comes from a long line of commie Irish police and firemen union members, and fully supports the commie marxist muslim slimeball currently inhabiting the White Hut.
Other than being a deceitful, egotistical, sexist, bigoted blowhard, O'Reilly is probably a pretty good fellow.
Very interesting... Never heard of it and seems worth exploring...
I don’t think that works... Illegal immigrants are deeply entrenched in our economy and the workforce to replace them is not in place. Of course, some will self-deport, but others are working and earning a living and they will likely not...
There is an interesting comment about the Bracero Program above that may holds some answers...
You mis-read my post. Either my punctuation is wrong (which I debated before posting), or you mis-read... Look again.
When I first got FNC, I watched BOR, for about a week or two. Then I stopped, and haven’t gone back. I can’t stand the guy.
Yes, same with Dobbs and Beck.
Former welfare queens.
I would not like to be the one trying to hound my grandmother out of anything.
Remember the snakes. Can't be too much different than MSM talking heads and various 'Rat operatives.
Is that a serious reply?
No, just wishful thinking. I believe it was called “workfare”.
The problem with the idea of “plan” is that we have no idea of what or who were are dealing with. A lone male is easy to deport. A man with a family is less so. A lone male connected with a family is also harder to deal with. Then there is the matter of how rooted they are. In short, we ned something like an effort to take a census of the immigrant population in this country, not all of whom are Hispanics, not by a long shot.
Yes, sanctuary cities should be penalized for harboring illegals by withdrawing federal funding for social problems that is based on numbers reported by the cities. All one needs is a rough estimate of how many are in a particular place and then cut funding by that amount, unless the immigrants step forward and register.
My guess is that if the cheap labor goes away, more farmers will be investing in machinery. If immigrants had replaced the blacks who went north to take industrial jobs , the cotton fields would still be picked by hand.
How the hell does he know, that cocksure bustard.
More than likely they're mostly all Obama kool-ade drinkers hoping he'll continue letting the whole problem ride while they reap the profits from underpaid slave labor.
And did I or did I not hear a grim, unsmiling Laura Ingraham slip in a remark to O'Reilly just under the wire of the closing music, "Bill, you are SO in love with Obama".......?
I HOPE I saw and heard that correctly.
The Bloviator was as arrogant, smug, crazy and repugnant tonight, as always.
Leni
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.