I fail to comprehend your logic. By your own admission, Purgason is the better candidate. But you will vote for Blunt because Purgason doesn’t have name recognition? What does that gain you?
Scenario 1)
Primary: You vote for Blunt, Blunt wins
General: You vote for Blunt, Blunt wins
Scenario 2)
Primary: You vote for Purgason, Blunt wins
General: You vote for Blunt, Blunt wins
Scenario 3)
Primary: You vote for Purgason, Purgason wins
General: You vote for Purgason, Purgason wins
Scenario 4)
Primary: You vote for Purgason, Purgason wins
General: You vote vor Purgason, Carnahan wins
Now, I ask you, how likeley is Scenario 4 to happen? Sounds like you’d be okay with any of the first 3 scenarios. If Purgason can best Blunt in the Primary, what makes you think he couldn’t handle Carnahan just fine? PPP(D) has Purgason down 4% to Carnahan with only 11% name recognition. If he were to win the Primary, the whole world will know who Purgason is. He’d be the next Sharron Angle.
He won’t win the primary. If it weren’t for FR nobody would know Chuck Purgason. I haven’t seen his name ANYWHERE else except FR and I live in St. Louis.