Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pennboricua
I agree. I'd bleed off the pressure into tankers.

What's to be gained by keeping that huge pressurized reservoir in the ground?

57 posted on 07/18/2010 4:11:00 PM PDT by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Cobra64

I agree. I’d bleed off the pressure into tankers.
What’s to be gained by keeping that huge pressurized reservoir in the ground?


I never understood why they didn’t just try to do that in the first place. If they were as close to having the relief wells in place as they had been saying, why didn’t they just focus on capturing more?

They kept saying the relief wells were ahead of schedule. Then they stopped to put this cap on. It was not worth taking the extra risk. That is unless they have concerns about the relief wells that they haven’t told us about.


58 posted on 07/18/2010 4:17:22 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson