Posted on 07/20/2010 10:46:28 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
But can we trust the GDP numbers from the USA (or the other countries). They fudge our inflation and GDP numbers in a lot of ways.
Not a very useful presentation. Presumably if “gradual reductions” are made the trend line can be tilted downward as the green and blue lines suggest. But what constitutes a “gradual reduction”? These charts really tells us nothing.
Year | US National Debt $billions | As a % of GDP | US Population (Millions) | US Natl Debt Per Person | Increase by Decade |
1970 | $380.9 | 37.6% | 203.3 | $1,874 | |
1980 | $909.0 | 33.3% | 216.5 | $4,199 | x 2.2 |
1990 | $3,206.3 | 55.9% | 248.7 | $12,892 | x 3.1 |
2000 | $5,628.7 | 58.0% | 281.4 | $20,003 | x 1.6 |
2010 (proj) | $14,456.3 | 98.1% | 310.2 | $46,602 | x 2.3 |
Does the last column look exponential to you? It looks exponential to me.
So we will need an exponential solution to control the US National Debt.
But wait a minute! Who says we have a problem? Maybe we dont need a solution, exponential or otherwise. Why not just let it keep growing?
It's worked for us so far.
Well, at least somebody has always loaned us the money to pay for it.
Oh, oh. Look at the second column. That 98.1% of GDP in 2010 doesnt look too good. That means the US National Debt is almost as big as US "annual income." I hope whoever is lending us the money will keep believing we can pay it back.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.