Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rabscuttle385; upchuck; Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj; BillyBoy; darkangel82; ...
"I'm going to vote for her because I believe this last election has consequences,"

I want to break stuff every time I hear some piece of crap say that. Words can't express my disdain for that imbecilic mindset. The consequence of a good Senator's election would be an automatic no vote for liberal Supreme Court appointees.

This smart mouthed punk is making like he has no choice in the matter.

And his radar is way off, she's as "mainstream" as Mark Foley's sex life. Just to listen to her try to hide her far-left views behind a smile and finely honed 'ugly girl' wit makes me curse the day her parents met.

19 posted on 07/21/2010 2:58:51 AM PDT by Impy (DROP. OUT. MARK. KIRK.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Impy

“I’m going to vote for her because I believe this last election has consequences,”

Democrats didn’t care about that when they lied about and voted against Robert Bork.


20 posted on 07/21/2010 4:53:22 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama's more worried about Israelis building houses than he is about Islamists building atomic bombs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Impy
“I'm going to vote for her because I believe this last election has consequences”

Except of course those last elections won by Republicans, right Lindsey?

The very last reasons anyone ever was able to give to support Lindsey Graham were his Pro-Life record and the usual Giuliani-esque establishment GOP talking point about Strict Constructionist judges.

Lindsey has now blown the judges argument out of the water.

What is even left, Lindsey? What? Beyond Free Republic and everything else - I mean this as a serious question now: what reason is left that a Conservative should support Lindsey Graham when we can't even count on him to stand firm on Strict Constructionist judges?

Seriously, let's say FR is too hard on Republicans - too purist, too demanding, unrealistic. Why should even a “mainstream” grassroots Conservative support you, Lindsey, when you can't even be relied upon to come through with the bare minimum you establishment Moderates promise?

Even the “Strict Constructionist” argument has now been nullified from your defense, Lindsey. What's left?

23 posted on 07/21/2010 6:21:13 AM PDT by TitansAFC ("At that point in time (2000 race), McCain was as conservative if not more so than GWB." --- pissant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson