Obama didn’t come to unite. He came to ‘get even’ with the USA and ‘whitey’. I get more and more convinced of that.
Liberal Black American politicians all think they should follow the Rhodesia/Zimbabwe method to political power. But there’s one major difference. There were always far more blacks in Africa than there were whites. In another 100 years, that may change (while Hispanics overtake us both) but, make no mistake, all their rhetoric about equality and multi-culturalism are only until they feel they have enough numbers to rule like they have in Zimbabwe. That’s their end game.
And liberal whites will try to hand it to them, if they don’t hand it to the Muslims first.
Era of post-racial politics?
More like the era of the “racism under every rock” politics?
When Bill Clinton can be called “our first black President” by Tony Morrison, a Nobel Prize and Pulitzer Prize-winning American author, editor, and professor, then what is “black”?
When Kenneth Gladney, a conservative black who was attacked outside of a Tea Party rally, can be called “not black enough” by the leader of his local NAACP, then what is “black”?
When Obama, whose mother is Caucasian can decide in his youth to be “black”, then what is “black”? Well, like other things about UhBama, it turns out to be a half truth, at best. By the dictionary, he is mulatto, a word that appears to be banned and forbidden to utter.
So clearly “black” means “liberal”. It is not about race, it is far more about ideology. And while I will not take a back seat to anyone on the issue of race, my concern is that people who find it so easy to keep track of a person’s skin color are far more red than anything else.
A black President?? OK show me a country setup and run by blacks in Africa that is just Peachy ???
When it comes to racial matters, Obama never misses an opportunity to jump to the wrong conclusion.
While Republicans took their eye off the ball to stare at the racial misdirection, the Dems slid the financial reform through.
Congratulations, SUCKERS!