Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Geithner calls repeal of Wall Street reforms 'inconceivable'
The Hill ^ | 7-22-10 | Silla Brush

Posted on 07/22/2010 7:40:06 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic

sury Secretary Timothy Geithner on Thursday said a Republican repeal of the Obama administration’s financial overhaul law is “inconceivable.”


House and Senate Republicans over the past week have argued for a repeal of the financial bill, arguing that it represents government overreach and threatens the growth of the U.S. economy. House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) was the first to call for a repeal of the regulatory changes.

Republican senators, including Richard Shelby (Ala.) and John Thune (S.D.), have also called for a repeal of part or all of the law.

“The reason why this bill became law was because Republicans decided they could not block it, that they could not, that it was untenable for them to block it,” Geithner told reporters at a breakfast held by The Christian Science Monitor.

 “It is inconceivable to me that they would find it compelling to try undo the basic architecture of reforms, and I think that’s a good thing,” he said.

President Obama signed the 2,315-page financial rewrite into law on Wednesday. The changes include a consumer protection bureau; new regulation of the $600 trillion derivatives market; a council of regulators to oversee broad financial risks, and a new system to wind down failing financial firms.



Geithner said the bill reflected input from Republicans who voted against it in the end. He mentioned Sen. Bob Corker’s (R-Tenn.) work to craft tougher rules for how the government winds down failing financial firms.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: geithner; reform; taxcheat; wallstreet

1 posted on 07/22/2010 7:40:10 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Somehow, I am not reassured when our Treasury Secretary feels the need to flog Mr. Skittles reforms. Is this another “vote for it to find out whats in it” moment?


2 posted on 07/22/2010 7:42:53 AM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

This should do nicely. Crank up the bureaucracy machine, wind down the cogs of business. Very shortly, we will have a Federal dictatorship under the control of Barack Hussein Obama. All business will be regulated, all records will need to go to the Feds.

We are about done. This is the hand on the plug for the respirator.


3 posted on 07/22/2010 7:44:58 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: equalitybeforethelaw

I wonder if any of our Congresscritters ever read the Bills that they pass? I think they need to enact a rule that no Bill can be longer than 100 pages. Anything that takes more than 100 pages to explain is burdensome to the public, or can be broken into smaller pieces.


4 posted on 07/22/2010 7:45:58 AM PDT by afraidfortherepublic (Southeast Wisconsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic
Geithner calls repeal of Wall Street reforms 'inconceivable'

It used to be that an 11-percent Congressional approval rating was inconceivable. These two phenomena may be linked.

5 posted on 07/22/2010 7:55:49 AM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

6 posted on 07/22/2010 7:57:17 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Geither lost his hair!
7 posted on 07/22/2010 8:04:14 AM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (Nothing to see here. Move along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Inconceivable?

Would that be like paying taxes such as the rest of
captive Americans do in Obama-Geithner-DNC neoslavery?


8 posted on 07/22/2010 8:19:12 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Article IV - Section 4 - The United States shall protect each of them against Invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian; dfwgator

Obviously Timmy doesn’t watch good movies, or he’d know not to use that word. (Thanks for putting those up.)


9 posted on 07/22/2010 8:27:32 AM PDT by Andrea19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

He’s right. The Rinos will not permit any of Obama’s fascist “progress” to be turned back.


10 posted on 07/22/2010 8:33:37 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

What really is, “inconceivable.” is the fact that Timothy Geithner is running anything more than an ice cream stand.


11 posted on 07/22/2010 9:46:10 AM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

How did the Nation survive this long without it? Geithner is using hyperbole!


12 posted on 07/22/2010 10:58:43 AM PDT by orinoco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

A man who can not conceive of multiple paths to reconstruct the finance industry has no place running the Department of Treasury.


13 posted on 07/22/2010 11:54:10 AM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyHighlander

Now all we need is a Westley.


14 posted on 07/22/2010 1:58:48 PM PDT by BenKenobi (We cannot do everything at once, but we can do something at once. -Silent Cal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson