Family limited partnerships are a common estate planning tool.
The real threat to Al here is the possibility of criminal prosecution. Based on her statement, civil damages would be modest as he never attacked her.
I want to thank those of you with some actual knowledge of this subject for providing some perspective, and taking the time, versus tabloids racing for one more way to put sex poodle in a headline or story.
The simple fact is that the one accuser who was finally identified, Ms. Hagerty:
• failed a polygraph that a prospective attorney ordered to back up her contentions;
• three other attorneys said pass;
• Had a record of molestation or attack claims, couldn’t get a restraining order after the first story because the judge didn’t buy her story
• Missed six police appointments at last count, to make charges for those various claims
• she went for the gold instead of stopping a sexual predator from attacking others, by either civil or criminal charge;
• held up a pair of pants on the cover of the Enquirer insisting that it was The Proof! of semen, when she already knew the results of the test (ranch dressing);
• Neither she nor the Enquirer admits that they never produced the “evidence” that at least 5 million paid to see, yet these dozens of sensational articles all cite that evidence! That’s quite a trick.
• And now two anonymous women, whose stories can’t be checked by any of the reporters — much less the accusers’ names — are being paraded about as if THEY now are the proof
• You add all this up and you conclude that he entered an LLC, like thousands of other Americans, thus THAT is proof that he attacked the first one, whose story is falling apart faster than one of his glaciers?
Seriously?
Hey, I’ve got a great bridge in Brooklyn. You are the only one I want to sell it to.