Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressman Floats Total Ban on Abortion Funding, Hyde Amendment Plus More
Life News ^ | 7/22/10 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 07/22/2010 3:50:39 PM PDT by wagglebee

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- When it comes to taxpayer funding of abortions from the federal government, pro-life advocates have to wage a set of battles annually to ensure abortion funding isn't present in various funding bills -- from HHS and USAID to health care and the District of Columbia.

What if all of the provisions against abortion funding could be rolled into one piece of legislation ensuring the federal government is not funding elective abortions?

That was the question Rep. Chris Smith of New Jersey, the chairman of the Congressional Pro-Life Caucus, asked himself.

He's answered it with a new bill titled the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act that he will introduce next Thursday to establish a consistent government-wide prohibition on abortion funding.

"For over 30 years, a patchwork of policies has regulated federal funding for abortion. Together these various policies ensure that the American taxpayer is not involved in funding the destruction of innocent human life through abortion on demand," Smith said in a letter to colleagues today that LifeNews.com obtained.

"This comprehensive approach will reduce the need for the numerous separate abortion funding policies and ensure that no program or agency is exempt from this important safeguard," he added.

"This new legislation will make permanent the policies that currently rely on regular re-approval," Smith said.

Under current law, funding for abortion and abortion coverage is prohibited through a patchwork of policies, most of which must be annually reapproved in Appropriations bills. The “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act” will reduce the need for numerous separate abortion funding policies and ensure that no program or agency is exempt from this important safeguard.

The bill essentially could be called a Hyde Amendment Plus, as it wraps together the Hyde Amendment, related to programs funded through the HHS appropriations, along with the Helms amendment, which applies to overseas programs, the Smith FEHBP amendment to stop abortion funding in federal employee health insurance programs, the Dornan amendment prohibiting abortion funding in the District of Columbia, and other policies governing programs such as the Peace Corp and federal prisons.

The beauty of the new bill is also seen in the fact that it will make these policies banning abortion funding in various situations permanents federal law instead of annual battles that pro-life advocates sometimes lose depending on who controls Congress and the White House.

Only an act of Congress to reverse the law would reinstate the abortion funding.

The new comprehensive abortion funding ban will also apply to the new national health care program President Barack Obama signed into law.

And it would codify the conscience clause known as Hyde-Weldon offering protections for medical workers who refuse to participate in abortions -- something Smith told his fellow members of Congress is important.

"The conscience clause ensures that recipients of federal funding do not discriminate against health care providers, including doctors, nurses and hospitals, because the providers do not provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions," he said.

To become original co-sponsors of the new legislation, members of Congress must sign on to the bill by July 29.

Related web sites:
Congressman Chris Smith - http://chrissmith.house.gov
Smith letter to colleagues on new bill



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 111th; abortion; bhoabortion; moralabsolutes; prolife
"The conscience clause ensures that recipients of federal funding do not discriminate against health care providers, including doctors, nurses and hospitals, because the providers do not provide, pay for, provide coverage of, or refer for abortions," he said.

Otherwise the FIRST thing Zero would make any person who benefits from federal funds kill babies.

1 posted on 07/22/2010 3:50:43 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 07/22/2010 3:51:32 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; Antoninus; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


3 posted on 07/22/2010 3:52:24 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

To late. Nothing is going to stop the communists takeover and paying for abortions by the Feds. We have lost control of the Federal Government and will suffer for many years to come.


4 posted on 07/22/2010 3:57:28 PM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Float it if you want — it will be sunk before it hits the water good. Oh, I support it — I’ll even go DOWN with the Pro-Life ship! But, just realize it’s a suicide mission at this point.

On the same token — all those RNC McCainiacs and RINO’s need to know, IF and WHEN Conservatives return the Republicans to the majority again, PAYBACK this time WILL BE AN END TO ABORTION-ON-DEMAND. Ultimately it SHOULD be by overturning Roe v. Wade. Possibly it should include a distinct pro-life amendment to the Constitution. Maybe it could mean the return of the issue to the States, AT LEAST in the interim between the overturning of Roe and the passage of the pro-life amendment... BUt Pro-Lifers SHOULD NO LONGER take no for an answer, and should NO LONGER allow themselves to be taken for granted.


5 posted on 07/22/2010 3:59:01 PM PDT by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patriot preacher

I agree, the ONLY acceptable resolution to the American Holocaust is a pro-life amendment.


6 posted on 07/22/2010 4:03:15 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: patriot preacher

Absolutely! Every Pro-life organization should have this as a criteria for all those New Congress-critters and Senators. This should be the agenda, or America should expect the wrath of God after 40 years of death come 2013.


7 posted on 07/22/2010 4:17:04 PM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: patriot preacher

I disagree that this is a suicide mission. It may fail but no harm will come to the Congressmen who sponsor and vote for this bill. It will once again expose the lie of a pro-life democrat.

Sometimes things need to be attempted even though failure is likely.


8 posted on 07/22/2010 4:18:27 PM PDT by Truth is a Weapon (If I weren't afraid of the feds, I would refer to Obama as our "undocumented POTUS")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Thanks for this.


9 posted on 07/22/2010 4:48:29 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (To the hard of hearing you shout, and for the blind you draw large and startling figures. F O'Connor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

You all are clearly knowledgeable on this topic, but I’d like to suggest maybe not being so pessimistic. While pro-life issues in general are as controversial as ever, TAXPAYER FUNDED abortions are often opposed even by those who are pro-abortion, particularly men. From what I’ve read, many “pro-choice” Americans feel this is a personal decision and for that reason they are not obligated to pay for some other person’s problem. An abortion is only about $300; people who pay taxes feel it’s hard to make the case that anyone in this country who wants one could not somehow come up with the funds. As for funding overseas abortions, the radicals, population types are for that, but again, the typical American citizen does not feel it’s his/her obligation to be aborting babies in Africa or Latin America.


10 posted on 07/24/2010 7:33:06 PM PDT by baa39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson