Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Journolist debates making its coordination with Obama explicit
The Daily Caller ^ | 07/26/2010 | Jonathan Strong

Posted on 07/26/2010 1:39:05 AM PDT by militanttoby

Sarah Palin’s speech to the 2008 Republican convention impressed more than a few doubters, including even some members of Journolist, an online community for liberal journalists.

“This speech is gangbusters,” wrote Ari Melber of the Nation. “Her tone is pitch perfect.” Adele Stan of the Media Consortium agreed: “Palin is golden.”

The exuberance appeared to unnerve the Guardian’s Michael Tomasky. “People get a hold of yourselves!” Tomasky wrote to his fellow Journolisters. “It’s a very good speech with good lines. But there’s very little substance.”

Rebecca Traister of Salon wrote to say she was grateful for Tomasky’s message discipline. (“This is a reassuring sentiment, since at the moment, I feel like we’re in End Times.”) But the rest of the country apparently didn’t agree. Polls a few days later showed Obama’s lead in the race had narrowed to virtually nothing.

Palin’s speech had been remarkably effective. This troubled members of Journolist. On Sept. 8, 2008, five days after Palin’s national debut, some members of the group discussed producing coordinated propaganda designed to wound Palin and boost Obama.

At an appearance in Colorado immediately following the convention, Palin had remarked that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had “gotten too big and too expensive for the taxpayers,” a point that seems commonplace now, but that at the time struck some as controversial.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dncaantipalin; dncvspalin; journolist; obamaantipalin; obamavspalin; palin; romney; romneyantipalin; romneyvspalin; sarahpalin; teamromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: militanttoby

Given that most of them all but pinned on “O” buttons, it’s a moot point.


21 posted on 07/26/2010 8:45:15 AM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire

Still think the best line of defense is Palin et al suing the entire group. Palin would have standing as she has been damaged. FOX I’m not to sure of...THey seem to have prospered by the negative comments. OTOH THey have the power to fight back.


22 posted on 07/26/2010 8:48:57 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

Hadn’t thought of that angle but isn’t it very hard to sue the press?


23 posted on 07/26/2010 9:22:02 AM PDT by penelopesire (FOX NEWS TRIBAL PRINCESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: penelopesire
Sue the list and the individual on the list. Subpoena/discovery should produce the entire list.
24 posted on 07/26/2010 9:29:54 AM PDT by hoosiermama (ONLY DEAD FISH GO WITH THE FLOW.......I am swimming with Sarahcudah! Sarah has read the tealeaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson