Posted on 07/26/2010 6:18:53 AM PDT by curth
Ryan Donmoyer Aug 30, 2008, 12:07am
I actually hesitate to bring this up…
But is anyone following this:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/8/29/17933/7330/417/579267
Adam Serwer Aug 30, 2008, 12:18am
……………………………………
Dylan Matthews Aug 30, 2008, 12:21am
Obama absolutely cannot touch this. Even if it’s true.
I think the press would justify covering it on the issue of trust, but for me it’s offensive that she would refuse to allow her daughter the choice. She has no business deciding what to make of that pregnancy. If her daughter wanted an abortion, it speaks very ill of Palin’s character to deny her the option.
Sara Mead Aug 30, 2008, 12:24am
A note to journolisters who may not be aware of this: “Downs child” is NOT an appropriate or sensitive way to refer to Palin’s son, who has Down Syndrome. Please use “people-first” language here. I’m not at all a fan of Palin, either, but as liberals and decent human beings, we should be respectful in how we refer to people with disabilities.
Adam Serwer Aug 30, 2008, 12:25am
that’s a bit of a stretch, even if it was her daughter’s baby, we don’t know that her daughter wanted an abortion.
The tone of the alaska newspaper article is definitely that there’s something fishy going on, it reads very bizarre. There’s something strange about an news article about how no one knew someone was pregnant–how is that a story?
Of course, Palin could just be really weird, and the reporter who wrote that story could just be particularly paranoid.
Harold Pollack Aug 30, 2008 12:44am
Yuck on several fronts. We don’t have any evidence she did anything wrong here. If the baby was her daughter’s, what’s the problem here? Unless she actively prevented her daughter from having an abortion, we should leave this alone.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/26/raw-journolist-emails-on-palins-downs-child/#ixzz0unHERSYt
Daily KOS !!!
Daily vile bile
The more Sarah Palin and those dear to her get attack, the more popular she will become.
The top link you left to Daily Kos is a broken one. Could you post it again?
These “people” are beneath contempt. There is a big, empty hole at the bottom of Hell waiting for these animals...........
A moron spouting an oxymoron...
We have some agreement here. When Sarah first learned of Bristol’s pregnancy, she should have killed Levi, fed him to Todd’s iditorad dogs and then dealt with the pregnancy issue. Think how much better off society would have been.
Wow! Mighty big of 'em.
These folks are disgusting. We knew that our news sources weren't unbiased but seeing them plot and plan over and over certainly drives home the point!
If Sarah does run in 2012, the hatred and vitriol will be off the charts. They are still collecting every speck of dirt to use.
Nope, it’s what was posted in the original email.
I found this but I am not sure it is what they were originally linking to:
http://www.dailykos.com/tag/unsubstantiated%20rumor
I think the news here is: Someone has a BUNCH of these “Journolist” emails.... seems like they intend to keep dribbling them out... until these people’s credibility is destroyed..
I bet... “Jounalist” around the country are scared to death right now.. and, searching their own outboxes to remember what they wrote!
Obama said he didn't want his daughters "punished with a baby" which I frankly thought was mostly a poor choice of words. But these journalists seem to really feel that way. They have no souls.
The link is not “broken”. It appears they moved/pulled the story. The tags are still there so I suspect they purged it.
Christians forgive rather than kill.
It’s the journolist commenting on a Kos Story that appears to have been pulled.
That said I note this post by Kathleen Geier:
“I am really hoping Palin will self-immolate and bring down the ticket with her. Because if she proves to be a popular choice who doesn’t screw up too badly, she could be really, really dangerous in the years to come.”
LOL, you betcha!
Okay, thank you ...
If an abortion doesn’t happen,
it means that there was an alternative.
With alternatives, that means that one alternative is morally superior to another.
Anyone who shines the light on the fact that killing the baby
is morally inferior to letting it live
is asking for vitriol and hatred from the “gender equality” crowd.
Here’s a ‘what color is the sky in your world’ post:
“In the post-Rathergate era, journalists should be on their guard for Republican dirty tricks.”
Christians forgive rather than kill.
************
After repentance, and only to a point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.