Posted on 07/26/2010 6:18:53 AM PDT by curth
“Jounalist” around the country are scared to death right now.. and, searching their own outboxes to remember what they wrote!
Actually, they've already reformed on another list and are working to set up rapid response to the "dribbles".
The above sounds like it could have been written here..I don’t get the point.
You think we think her baby is actually her daughter's baby?
Dead on right....the caller has the whole archives...years of bile from the self anointed...we really need a data base of ALL the names...and every time they write something...anything...we need to be in the comments rubbing their nose in their own crap...
and people need to be calling their bosses....especially those who work for public universities...
The ignorance of the left never ceases to amaze me. Apparently, they are unable to perform simple math or have any knowledge of the basics of human reproduction.
Kathleen Geier
Aug 30, 2008, 5:20pm
“When I first heard this story, I thought it was preposterous. (And btw, a scenario similar to this lurid tale occurred last season on Desperate Housewives). And maybe I really am losing it, driven over the edge at last by my hatred of all things Republican, but at this point I’m starting to believe it.
There are a lot of things about the official story that just don’t add up. There’s a good summary in this recent Daily Kos post”
Geier was really ‘excited’ by this fabrication and smear of Sarah Palin. These people are sick and should be driven out of working in journalism ever again. I can’t believe what I just read(all 15 pages). Pathetic!
In a situation such as Bristol's however, the boy/man would have been expected to marry the girl/woman. They would not have stoned him.
I can't imagine there's much more they could possibly find. Of course, making stuff up is not beyond them.
here is the actual link to the story. It’s not there anymore.
“Making stuff up” is their idea of responsible journalism. We had numerous successful and almost successful examples during the 2000 election and every election since then. They are evil, or to quote GWB, evildoers. They conspire to determine the outcome of elections and it should be a punishable offense. It’s chilling to think of the pain they’ve caused innocent people.
Whoever said”Liberals were”Decent Human Beings”?What is “Decent”about rapacious taxation of “Producers”in order to BUY VOTES by giving their plunder to “Non-Producers”?If individuals utilize this practice it’s called”THEFT”!When Liberals utilize this practice it’s called”Re-Distribution Of Wealth”!Wherein lies the difference??
LOL!
This just shows the bankruptcy of liberal reasoning among the chattering classes they (especially the women) cannot comprehend anyone would give birth to a Down Syndrome baby by choice. There MUST be something fishy. It simply isn't DONE.
This is the root of the elitists’ contempt for Sarah Palin.
And when every base theory they pursue for Sarah's decision fails, and she keeps appearing in public with that baby in her arms, face glowing.... rather than accepting that she just loved her baby for who he was, before he was born ... it makes them more angry and they hate her even more.
agreed
It drives libs batty when you point out their support of theft.
The whole reason for many libs to BE libs is that they can feel good about themselves as “good people” for supporting the issues they support.
When you point out that theft is theft no matter how many approve of it, they really get uncomfortable.
It’s pretty easy to do this - you step them down a scenario of giving voluntarily vs you, individually, taking money from someone to give to someone else, then having 3 people standing around the theft approving, then 20, then 100, and asking them each time if it’s still theft.
Never heard of the Nights Templar I take it...
If Sarah does run in 2012, the hatred and vitriol will be off the charts. They are still collecting every speck of dirt to use.
“Collect?” Why bother when anything they make up will be
used by the media without question.
"Palin's faked "pregnancy"? Covering for teen daughter? UPDATE #2!
by Inky99
Fri Aug 29, 2008 at 02:19:42 PM PST But it appears that Pallin's last child, a baby with Down's syndrome, may not be hers. It may be that of her teenage daughter.
Here's a link just to get you started:
http://www.adn.com/..."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.