Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US delivers first batch of air-to-air missiles (Pakistan)
The Daily Mail, Pakistan ^ | 07/27/2010 | Shakeel Ahmed

Posted on 07/27/2010 12:35:00 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

US delivers first batch of air-to-air missiles

By Shakeel Ahmed

ISLAMABAD—In continuation to the F-16 Induction Plan and after the recent delivery of Block-52 F-16 C/D aircraft, PAF last week received the first batch of Advance Medium Range Air to Air Missiles (AMRAAM) AIM-120 from USA.

According to PAF spokesman the induction of these Beyond Visual Range (BVR) missiles in the PAF inventory not only marks the achievement of another major milestone in PAF Developmental Plan, but also bolsters its defensive capabilities manifold. Additionally, this capability brings PAF at par with other modern Air Forces of the world in terms of sophistication of its air-to air arsenal.

Importantly, this is the first time PAF has inducted BVR missiles which will strengthen its Air Defence capability manifold.

Delivery of the remaining aircraft, weapons including AMRAAMs & other related equipment is progressing as per schedule, and is planned to complete by the end of this year, the spokesman said.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; amraam; f16; pakistan

1 posted on 07/27/2010 12:35:02 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Air to air? Good. About time Pakistan shot down the Taliban Air Force:


2 posted on 07/27/2010 12:42:53 AM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Any aid to a questionable ally like Pakistan makes me wary, but selling stuff like the AMRAAM to Pakistan makes me downright nervous.

IMHO, any military aid we give/sell to Pakistan ought to be geared towards - and linked to - the specific mission of aiding U.S. efforts in hitting Taliban strongholds in northern Pakistan.


3 posted on 07/27/2010 12:59:14 AM PDT by DemforBush (Serpentine, Shel! SERPENTINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

‘Can’t monitor military aid to Pakistan’: US to India

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2558066/posts

The US has virtually rejected India’s demand for a monitoring mechanism on military aid being given to Pakistan for the fight against terror. At the same time, it has also raised concerns about the links the ISI has with terror outfits and said that the strategic approach of the Pakistani spy agency needs to fundamentally change.

The US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen said that there are concerns about “the links the ISI has”. He admitted that there is a lot about the Pakistani spy agency that the US does not know and added that the matter is being taken up in all “engagements” that the US has with Pakistan. This comes after the Indian government revealed that there is fresh evidence to show the ISI and LeT planned and executed the terror attack in Mumbai together.

However, Mullen, who met Defence Minister A K Antony and Chairman of the Chiefs of Staff Committee Air Chief Marshal P V Naik virtually rejected an Indian demand for a monitoring mechanism on the same.

Sources said that in his meeting with Mullen, Antony expressed concerns that the military aid being given to Pakistan could be used against India and is “disproportionate” to the terror threat the country faces. Antony also asked the US to constitute a “monitoring mechanism” to ensure that the estimated figure of over $1.5 billion is not used for other purposes. He is also expected to take up the matter with the US administration during his visit to the nation in September this year.

However, Mullen said that the weapons being given to Pakistan will not create an imbalance in the region and are being used for the fight against terror groups on the Afghan border. On whether a monitoring mechanism would be established, Mullen said,”the relationship and understanding that we have (with Pakistan) will provide an understanding (of) where the systems are being used.”

Mullen said increasing military assistance is an indication of the level of trust that Washington has in Islamabad. India’s concerns came after the US last year approved a $7.5 billion aid package for Pakistan that also supports a $400 million annual package to upgrade Pakistani military under the ‘Pakistan Counterinsurgency Capability Fund’.


US Tells India Arms Sales to Pakistan Will Continue

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2557887/posts

The top U.S. military officer told Indian leaders Friday the United States will continue to sell weapons to Pakistan, and that the sales do not pose a threat to India.

Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Admiral Mike Mullen says he is confident the weapons the United States is selling to Pakistan are being used for their intended purpose - to fight al-Qaida and related terrorist organizations. But he says he urged Indian leaders to continue to discuss their concerns with him and other U.S. officials.

“We certainly understand the concerns and at the same time I don’t believe that we’ve sold any weapons to Pakistan which greatly imbalance the capability between the two countries.”

The admiral said the United States does not monitor the exact location or use of each item it sells to Pakistan, but his confidence they are being used properly is based on the increased trust between the U.S. and Pakistani governments built up in recent years.

U.S. officials also noted that the United States has sold sophisticated weapons to India, and is working on more sales, possibly including fighter jets.

Admiral Mullen praised recent improvements in U.S.-Indian relations, including an agreement signed Friday by the American ambassador and India’s Home Minister to create a Counterterrorism Cooperation Initiative. The initiative includes a plan for cooperation on cyber security, which Admiral Mullen cited as a key area for U.S.-Indian cooperation.

The admiral welcomed the recent India-Pakistan dialogue, but said he was “discouraged” when the talks broke down. And he said he shares concerns about the activities of Pakistan’s intelligence service, the ISI, which has been accused of supporting terrorist groups including the Haqqani network in Afghanistan and Lashkar-e-Taiba, which carried out the Mumbai attacks in 2008. Mullen says the ISI needs to “fundamentally change” its strategic approach.

“The ISI is an organization that has operated within Pakistan in concert with what it believes are its own national interests. And at the same time, there’s an awful lot about them that I don’t know,” he said.

The admiral said some elements of the ISI clearly operate on orders from the Pakistani government, but he could not say whether all the group’s activities are under the government’s control.

Admiral Mullen said he expresses his concerns about ISI to Pakistani leaders on a regular basis, and he will do so again when he meets them later in this trip through the region.


4 posted on 07/27/2010 1:07:50 AM PDT by James C. Bennett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Thanks for the additional info. I certainly understand India’s concern. Weapons like the AMRAAM has absolutely no value against Taliban forces, or any other group that doesn’t have any aircraft, for that matter.

My cynical nature leads me to think this is as much, or more, about propping up the current regime in Pakistan than anything designed to wipe out Taliban groups operating out of Pakistan. Lavish the PPP with enough high tech weaponry, and they’ll continue to cooperate to an extent, as well as keep a grip on the country (and its nukes).

I could be wrong, of course. But I’m afraid I have very little faith in our Pakistani allies these days. Or our Afghani ones, for that matter.


5 posted on 07/27/2010 1:42:03 AM PDT by DemforBush (Serpentine, Shel! SERPENTINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DemforBush

Aiding and abeting a Muslim-controlled country is standard practice for the Obama regime. If Gates and the stupid Admiral had backbones, they would have refused and resigned a long time ago to follow any orders from this idiot in the White House. .....But of course, Bill Gates has been a political whore for many years and doesn’t give a damn about our military. JMO


6 posted on 07/27/2010 2:08:37 AM PDT by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
Off Thread Topic:

INVESTIGATIVE PROJECT.org - For the Record - The IPT Blog: "LEAKED DOCUMENTS SHOW PAKISTANI SPY AGENCY AIDS TALIBAN" (July 26, 2010, 5:55 pm) (Read More...)

7 posted on 07/27/2010 3:46:03 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Sheesh. Why don’t we just cut out the middle man and FedEx a few AMMRAMs directly to the Chinese, and include the T.O.s while we’re at it.


8 posted on 07/27/2010 6:16:50 AM PDT by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson