Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jim macomber
One reason given by the judge is that it “burdens lawfully-present (aliens) because their liberty will be restricted while their status is checked.”

What aboout sobriety checkpoints?

34 posted on 07/28/2010 12:50:50 PM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: pfflier

This means that the AZ police should haul every law breaker into jail..no tickets for no license and no insurance..just haul them in and then they can determine their status. I imagine that Sheriff Joe will have his take on this as well.


35 posted on 07/28/2010 12:57:23 PM PDT by Oldexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

To: pfflier
Absolutely.

When the sobriety checkpoints were challenged as violating fourth amendment rights, the courts acknowledged they in fact did so. The courts then determined that the fourth amendment violation, which would otherwise be unconstitutional, should stand anyway because the checkpoints address a "compelling state interest". They found keeping drivers who'd been drinking off the streets was a "compelling state interest".

Even if the Arizona law were otherwise unconstitutional, and in my opinion it is not, are not addressing illegal immigration, protecting the borders and national security "compelling state interests".

39 posted on 07/28/2010 1:12:20 PM PDT by jim macomber (Author: "Bargained for Exchange", "Art & Part", "A Grave Breach" http://www.jamesmacomber.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson