Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US hopes for Iran nuclear talks US hopes for Iran nuclear talks
Al Jazeera ^ | July 29th 2010 | Agencies

Posted on 07/29/2010 3:49:49 AM PDT by Cardhu

The United States has said it hopes to hold talks with Iran soon and would be prepared to follow up on a plan to provide fuel for Iran's research reactor in exchange for low-enriched uranium.

The plan was mooted in Geneva last October at a meeting between Iranian officials and senior diplomats from the five permanent UN Security Council members - Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States - along with Germany.

"We obviously are fully prepared to follow up with Iran on specifics regarding our initial proposal involving the Tehran research reactor ... as well as, you know, the broader issues of trying to fully understand the nature of Iran's nuclear programme," PJ Crowley, the US state department spokesman, said on Wednesday.

"We hope to have the same kind of meeting coming up in the coming weeks that we had last October."

"There have been contacts between Iran" and Catherine Ashton, the European Union's high representative, about a "prospective meeting," he said.

Last October's meeting was called to discuss the proposed deal, which would have seen Iran send some of its low-enriched uranium to Russia and France for further purification into fuel for a medical isotopes reactor in Tehran.

Necessary fuel

The six major powers say that Iran could be using its uranium enrichment programme as a cover to develop nuclear weapons, but Tehran insists it is entirely peaceful and is designed to meet the country's civilian energy needs.

In February, Iran announced that it had started the further enrichment of its uranium stocks to about 20 per cent purity, from about 3.5 per cent previously, raising concerns about the use of the nuclear material.

(Excerpt) Read more at english.aljazeera.net ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; talks
The state department's announcement comes weeks after Barack Obama, the US president, signed a bill imposing the toughest sanctions on Iran over its nuclear programme.
1 posted on 07/29/2010 3:49:51 AM PDT by Cardhu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Your title is repeated in the header of your post.


2 posted on 07/29/2010 4:15:55 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thethirddegree

Yes I made a mistake.


3 posted on 07/29/2010 4:17:30 AM PDT by Cardhu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Guess we ought to add the folks at aljazeera to the list of journOlist apparatchiks.


4 posted on 07/29/2010 4:17:37 AM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu
The United States has said it hopes to hold talks with Iran soon and would be prepared to follow up on a plan to provide fuel for Iran's research reactor in exchange for low-enriched uranium.

Now isn't that special. Why it just makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.

Hey boneheads (that's YOU Barry &Co) if you give me a FREE Pony, I'll stop calling you commieRATS for a month week.

How about that 'deal'? Want to sit down and have talks about it?

[Simpletons. The whole gubmint is full of simpletons!]

5 posted on 07/29/2010 4:39:34 AM PDT by Condor51 (SAT CONG!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu
...follow up on a plan to provide fuel for Iran's research reactor in exchange for low-enriched uranium.

Maybe I need to research the science here a little bit. But it sounds like we'll take their low-quality, unusable-in-its-current-form uranium, and give them back fuel-grade (purity) uranium? Um, isn't that just that much closer to being weapons-grade? Aren't we signing up to do a lot of the work of making a nuclear weapon for them? Does this sound stupid beyond belief (except coming from hussein) to anyone else?

6 posted on 07/29/2010 5:29:28 AM PDT by ThunderSleeps (obama out now! I'll keep my money, my guns, and my freedom - you can keep the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

I do not think it is possible to negotiate and come to an agreement in good faith with muslims, particularly the insane clerics that run Iran.

One does not negotiate with a pack of wolves. You better bring gun to the party if you want to survive.


7 posted on 07/29/2010 5:38:27 AM PDT by Paratesties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Hahahahahahahaqhahaha ha ha.... Fat chance.


8 posted on 07/29/2010 6:09:44 AM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cardhu

Looks like our policy is “HOPE”. Good to know Hillary is on point on this one. (Sarcasm).


9 posted on 07/29/2010 6:18:41 AM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson