Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shirley Sherrod Goes After Breitbart On AC360 (Can Breitbart Sue Sherrod Over What She Said Here?
YouTube ^ | 7/22/2010 | HotAirPundit

Posted on 07/29/2010 9:58:26 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

Shirley Sherrod: "I think that he [Breitbart] would like to get us struck back in the times of slavery. That's where I think he would like to see all black people end up again."

Anderson Cooper: "You think he's racist."

Sherrod: "I do."

(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ac360; andersoncooper; breitbart; cnn; democrats; sherrod; shirleysherrod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: Laissez-faire capitalist
"Shirley Sherrod: "I think that he [Breitbart] would like to get us struck back in the times of slavery. That's where I think he would like to see all black people end up again." "

Words designed to fire up the blacks, that's all that is; she was caught with her hand in the cookie er, CRACKER jar, and needs support from "her kind" - using her phrasology.

As I have previously stated, whites don't want slavery times back again, there are some things that are just not profitable or enjoyable to own.

White people - like Breitbart - have enough to deal with, without the feeding and caring of another human being, at least one they did not procreate.

The most obvious point that makes her statement absurd - and yes, racist - is that there a hundreds of laws and safeguards in place to prevent such a thing from ever happening.

But Shirley needs to really take this to heart, WE DON'T WANT ANY SLAVES, period. She's still stuck in the 19th century, like most of her NAACP supporters, and I guess as long as that scenario works to create VICTIMS, she will remain there.

Obama and his race-based administration has created an atmosphere of distrust and intolerance that was supposedly on the wane; we're back to walking on eggshells and avoiding mention of any "color" to the point people are contemplating removing the black crayon from their kids' crayolas.

How much more ridiculous and childish can this bunch get? No one alive today can help what happened in slavery days. White Republicans eradicated slavery, and did most of the heavy lifting for civil rights, but because of handouts, they have been brainwashed to think the dems are the end all, be all of political parties.

Shirley, even if it did come back, no one would want you to listen to all the bitching. Go enjoy your new job and leave Breitbart alone...after all, all he did was expose you and your words to America, and let them see the NAACP agreeing with those same inflamatory words.
21 posted on 07/29/2010 10:15:58 AM PDT by FrankR (It doesn't matter what they call us, only what we answer to....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

The transcriber owes you a “?”.


22 posted on 07/29/2010 10:16:11 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

If AC had said “DO you think he is a racist”? that would have been a question.

“You think he is a racist” is not a question.


23 posted on 07/29/2010 10:16:34 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Enterprise
depositions

You just know she would feel entitled to determine which questions she wants to answer. I wonder have many trips for orders and sanctions it would take to get her attention. Please , please let there be video tape of her deposition.

24 posted on 07/29/2010 10:17:08 AM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it freedom has a flavor the protected will never know .F Trp 8th Cav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Keep talking, Shirley.


25 posted on 07/29/2010 10:19:42 AM PDT by swain_forkbeard (Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Shirley Sherrod is a racist. Although she was let off the hook in the case of the story she told about the white farmer, later in the video she clearly states that the ONLY reason people oppose Obama is because they are all racist.


26 posted on 07/29/2010 10:21:47 AM PDT by chatter4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

To think of all the people on this forum that went out of their way to defend this lady and slam Breitbart....


27 posted on 07/29/2010 10:22:03 AM PDT by Maverick68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Breitbart NOW can counter sue her.. and probably WIN...


28 posted on 07/29/2010 10:22:17 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

The only thing she would prove by suing is that she is very stupid. Litigation will not allow her to dictate what happens. She is not in charge of some government program if she sues him. She cannot control what happens. It is not a one way street. She will get her head handed to her.


29 posted on 07/29/2010 10:26:08 AM PDT by isthisnickcool (NOVEMBER-2-2010!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

In conversational English, a “declarative” sentence spoken with a rising inflection, as Mr. Andersen used, is a question. In a court of law it might be seen as a leading question, but journalist ask leading questions to elicit provocative answers. If Ms. Sherrod had said, “Oh, no, I don’t think that!” it would not have been provocative. Of course the poor, widdle, befuddled Sherrod obviously thinks any conservative is a racist.


30 posted on 07/29/2010 10:27:03 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc

She thinks she’s some sort of civil rights warrior. I bet she doesn’t have the mental toughness to withstand tough depositions. Then, even if she doesn’t have to answer questions if deposition, a good attorney can still get her to screw up on the stand and once she says something she will HAVE to answer more questions once she opens the door.


31 posted on 07/29/2010 10:31:27 AM PDT by Enterprise (As a disaster unfolds, a putz putts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

Do I think liberals are the real racist of our age?

bmwycle: I do.


32 posted on 07/29/2010 10:32:40 AM PDT by bmwcyle (It is Satan's fault)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

LOL - Shirley got caught with her hand in the cracker jar.


33 posted on 07/29/2010 10:34:07 AM PDT by Enterprise (As a disaster unfolds, a putz putts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

“You think he is a racist” is not a question.

In a transcript, I agree, but voice inflections are very important in determining if something is actually a question. English is not a monotonic language, although our use of inflection is not remotely as complex as in Mandarin Chinese.


34 posted on 07/29/2010 10:41:34 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

I’m not a lawyer. But based on what I know I think the court would hold that both of them are public figures.


35 posted on 07/29/2010 10:41:42 AM PDT by freespirited (There are a lot of bad Republicans but there are no good Democrats.--Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets; All

Problem is, is that whether or not something can be demmed as “rising inflection” is in the eye of the beholder, and a few on a jury might think of it as being a question, while the rest may think of it as being a declarative statement.

Not open and shut at all.

Secondly, she added to Coopers statement. She said that Breitbart is “vicious.”


36 posted on 07/29/2010 10:45:48 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

It is nearly impossible for public officials to sue others.(politicians are public officials)


37 posted on 07/29/2010 10:47:17 AM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

“The transcriber owes you a “?”.”

Was that a statement or a question? Which, of course is the point, right?

There’s no difference between a question and a statement.

There’s no difference between a question and a statement?

When read, do these two sentences mean the same thing?

Yeah, a transcription needs punctuation.


38 posted on 07/29/2010 10:48:54 AM PDT by jessduntno (Each day, I await a fresh insult to America by this usurper...he never fails to deliver.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist

If you listen, Andersen is clearly asking a (leading) question. Lawyers are not allowed to ask leading questions, unless the judge has deemed a witness hostile or unresponsive (like a child). Journalists ask, especially television journalists, ask leading questions for a living.


39 posted on 07/29/2010 10:49:44 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jessduntno

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

I took some out of open stock. Help yourself.


40 posted on 07/29/2010 10:51:10 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The naked casuistry of the high priests of Warmism would make a Jesuit blush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson