This could have been a great insight into a formative change in America brought about by Obama— certainly not the one he and his followers envisioned, but one just as powerful and real.
Instead the liberal author of this piece verily drips with condescension throughout, and does his best to invoke the kook fringe.
I suppose if you’re a writer for the NYT and you support the social ideal of non-work, you can expect to eat as well when you’re unemployed as when you toiled for the regime.
When they finally learn the truth, it will be too late for them.
I’m more amazed that the New York Times ran this story
than offended by any condescension. Thanks to Kartographer
for picking up on this. Someone has to do this sort of thing.