Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Grand Strategy: Bankrupt America
LibertyNewsNetwork.tv ^ | Art Thompson

Posted on 07/31/2010 7:30:04 PM PDT by USALiberty

JBS CEO Art Thompson offers an analysis of the week’s news, discussing how Hillary Clinton’s announcement of the U.S. sending $7.5 billion foreign aid to Pakistan is part of the Insiders’ plan to drain the American people and bankrupt the economy. He also discusses how Mexico supports the Federal Government’s Supreme Court lawsuit against the state of Arizona for defending its borders from the influx of illegal immigrants. (VIDEO AT LINK)

(Excerpt) Read more at libertynewsnetwork.tv ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arizona; immigrantinvasion; kenyanusurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: USALiberty

Nothing can stop Obama. The next generation of brainwashed loons will be ready to vote for the first time in the 2012 elections. Also, forget about 2010 midterms. The ninnies are waiting to give “2014 health care reform a chance”.

The USA is already destroyed. The only remaining reason to live is to slaughter the leftists like any other enemy on the field.


21 posted on 07/31/2010 8:01:43 PM PDT by Soothesayer (“None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freespirited

I really believe obama is an enemy of the state.


22 posted on 07/31/2010 8:05:17 PM PDT by GlockThe Vote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty
meccajoker

He's already done a wonderful job making America bankrupt. This 7.5 billion to Pakistan is part of his making Islam dominate plan. That's 7.5 billion to a Muslim country that has NUKES.

23 posted on 07/31/2010 8:07:27 PM PDT by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
I think there's a clause....foreign or “DOMESTIC”...
They wrote that in for a reason.....Guess we missed that...
24 posted on 07/31/2010 8:33:38 PM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Yes. You crash the system and out of that chaos you can create your order on a global level.


25 posted on 07/31/2010 8:37:33 PM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

No offense to those who think he wants to bankrupt us; but I think he is prey to the age-old communist/socialista/liberal pipe dream of wealth AND redistribution of it. A kindergartner cound tell you the two ideals are plumb out of sync.

However, by the time they get to high school, after 9 years of socialista brainwashing, the poor kids are only able to ask: “Dude — if we owe money, why can’t we like just print some more and like pay it?” Sound familiar? Do not all dim-o-crats tacitly believe the same thing?


26 posted on 07/31/2010 8:38:07 PM PDT by Migraine (Diversity is great... ...until it happens to YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Migraine; nmh

The following link is to an old FR thread, about an even older conservative booklet called “The Revolution Was”, written in 1938 about FDR and the New Deal. It is ALL happening again - amazingly, chillingly so. Only worse.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts

An Excerpt:

Worse outwitted were those who kept trying to make sense of the New Deal from the point of view of all that was implicit in the American scheme, charging it therefore with contradiction, fallacy, economic ignorance, and general incompetence to govern.

But it could not be so embarrassed and all that line was wasted, because, in the first place, it never intended to make that kind of sense, and secondly, it took off from nothing that was implicit in the American scheme. It took off from a revolutionary base.

The design was European. Regarded from the point of view of revolutionary technic it made perfect sense. Its meaning was revolutionary and it had no other. For what it meant to do it was from the beginning consistent in principle, resourceful, intelligent, masterly in workmanship, and it made not one mistake......

Having passed this crisis, the New Deal went on from one problem to another, taking them in the proper order, according to revolutionary technic; and if the handling of one was inconsistent with the handling of another, even to the point of nullity, that was blunder in reverse.

The effect was to keep people excited about one thing at a time, and divided, while steadily through all the uproar of outrage and confusion a certain end, held constantly in view, was pursued by main intention.

The end held constantly in view was power.


27 posted on 07/31/2010 8:42:13 PM PDT by 21twelve ( UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES MY ARSE: "..now begin the work of remaking America."-Obama, 1/20/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty
Posted numerous times but just as good the 100th time as it is the first.


28 posted on 07/31/2010 9:07:36 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (It's easy being a communist when you're rich. Just ask Barry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

Liberalism/Socialism is to a Democratic Republic as cancer is to the human body.


29 posted on 07/31/2010 9:07:48 PM PDT by R0CK3T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

30 posted on 07/31/2010 9:18:15 PM PDT by cranked
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

That sorry bastard, and he is a bastard, is sending more to Pakistan than he sent to the people along the Gulf of Mexico.


31 posted on 07/31/2010 9:44:38 PM PDT by boycott (CAL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty
Obama’s Grand Strategy: Bankrupt America

Barack Hussein... Cloward Piven...What's the difference?

This is news?

32 posted on 07/31/2010 11:10:02 PM PDT by Publius6961 ("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USALiberty

Obama’s an idiot.


33 posted on 07/31/2010 11:26:54 PM PDT by trailboss800
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen

All of our “public servant” politicians should be forbidden from profiting from their time in office.

Want to write a book? Fine. Want to go on speaking tours? Cool. But all proceeds should go into the public coffers that they helped drain.


34 posted on 07/31/2010 11:30:57 PM PDT by Nickname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nmh

I can remember a day when a billion dollars was a huge amount of money. I can also remember a day when the US Congress had to appropriate money before it could be released from the federal treasury. Now it appears the President can borrow and spend at will.


35 posted on 08/01/2010 3:47:40 AM PDT by Soul of the South (When times are tough the tough get going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Soul of the South
“I can remember a day when a billion dollars was a huge amount of money. I can also remember a day when the US Congress had to appropriate money before it could be released from the federal treasury. Now it appears the President can borrow and spend at will.”

I can remember that too.

Today we don't operate under laws or approval. The only approval needed is Obama or his close allies. We have a dictatorshup happening. People are so dam ignorant they go along with anything.

36 posted on 08/01/2010 8:11:36 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
The following link is to an old FR thread, about an even older conservative booklet called “The Revolution Was”, written in 1938 about FDR and the New Deal. It is ALL happening again - amazingly, chillingly so. Only worse.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts

An Excerpt:

Worse outwitted were those who kept trying to make sense of the New Deal from the point of view of all that was implicit in the American scheme, charging it therefore with contradiction, fallacy, economic ignorance, and general incompetence to govern.

But it could not be so embarrassed and all that line was wasted, because, in the first place, it never intended to make that kind of sense, and secondly, it took off from nothing that was implicit in the American scheme. It took off from a revolutionary base.

The design was European. Regarded from the point of view of revolutionary technic it made perfect sense. Its meaning was revolutionary and it had no other. For what it meant to do it was from the beginning consistent in principle, resourceful, intelligent, masterly in workmanship, and it made not one mistake......

Having passed this crisis, the New Deal went on from one problem to another, taking them in the proper order, according to revolutionary technic; and if the handling of one was inconsistent with the handling of another, even to the point of nullity, that was blunder in reverse.

The effect was to keep people excited about one thing at a time, and divided, while steadily through all the uproar of outrage and confusion a certain end, held constantly in view, was pursued by main intention.

The end held constantly in view was power.


==================================================== Yes! I'm surprised Obama is building GOLF COURSES to “make jobs” and have the impoverished play the white man's game of golf. No kidding. FDR had them building golf courses! Now we have a President the plays more golf that a real golfer and is not white.

Our model though isn't European socialism. It's a dictatorship. Obam is salivating for this. Off topic - I thought it was amusing that suddenly Michele and her one daughter HAD to go to Spain to see their "close long time friends", the King and Queen of Spain. Honestly, do you really believe the King and Queen were close friends of a black family that had to swindle people to get a mortgage that was cheap and a house that was BELOW market value with real estate was peaking?

LOL! This was done to avid the embarrassment of NOT being invited to the Clinton's wedding. Hitlery made her statement on who their "close friends" were and so was Obama. Hitlery was also making her statement that the Clinotn's are still "royal" and don't need the Obama's. Hitlery will run again.

37 posted on 08/01/2010 8:22:50 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson