To: aruanan
You completely miss the point. You completely miss the point. The point is, in today's political environment, who would do a better job of selecting US Senators, state legislators or the people. State legislatures are notoriously corrupt these days, and I much prefer that the people elect US Senators.
45 posted on
08/03/2010 8:24:56 PM PDT by
Will88
To: Will88
State legislatures are notoriously corrupt these days, and I much prefer that the people elect US Senators.And what ignorant mass of morons do you suppose keeps electing those corrupt legislators?
What sort of perverse reasoning leads you to believe they would be able to do a better job choosing national senators?
72 posted on
08/03/2010 11:14:19 PM PDT by
Publius6961
("In 1964 the War on Poverty Began --- Poverty won.")
To: Will88
You completely miss the point. The point is, in today's political environment, who would do a better job of selecting US Senators, state legislators or the people. State legislatures are notoriously corrupt these days, and I much prefer that the people elect US Senators.
State legislators. They're no more corrupt than they've ever been. And the population at large is just as stupid and easily led (see the election of Obama) as it's ever been. The point is that having the senators picked by governors or state legislatures is to make an ADDITIONAL check/balance that is lacking when it's just a popular vote against the federal government.
85 posted on
08/04/2010 10:27:32 AM PDT by
aruanan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson