Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Williams
'If this stands then all states must permit gay marriage, as a Constitutional right?"

No, this decision only applies to this particular statute. And, a District Court decision IS NOT precedent for other courts, in fact it's not even precedent for this court - just these plaintiffs and these questions of law.

For this to have precedential value nationally, it will have to be affirmed by the Supreme Court.

58 posted on 08/04/2010 2:17:28 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: OldDeckHand

My gay friend from high school who calls himself conservative is cheering up and down for this. Gonna shut up this time cause he really is conservative with everything else but the gay issues.


62 posted on 08/04/2010 2:20:28 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: OldDeckHand

First, for a federal district court to rule that any state cannot define marriage as between a man and a woman, is huge.

District courts often look to other District opinions for guidance.

It’s a very dangerous decision and precedent in the broadest sense. I do hope it’s appealed all the way.


69 posted on 08/04/2010 2:25:48 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson