That is just the point isn't it?
You have NOT been misquoted. I chronologically listed all your pertaining previous posts in this thread.
You DID claim Android is not a product.
And when challenged, you DID declare that since you can't walk into a carrier's shop and buy Android, so therefore its not a product.
And..I did destroy your nonsensical arguments by using IE8 and Microsoft Security Essentials plus as examples of products you can't buy in a shop, plus direct definitions of what a product is from two dictionaries.
By claiming that you have been “misquoted”, while trying to dismiss your own previous quotres as “distractions”, your are pusposfully peddling falsehoods
“You destroyed your own strawman. It's easy to destroy what you yourself built. “
Naaah..I destroyed your “Android is not a product” mantra, and your “since you can't walk into a shop and buy Android” so therefore Android is not a product” nonsense.
In fact, I so effectively took you apart, that as at now, you are busy backpedaling as quickly as your legs can carry you, reduced to acting like a Democratic Party congressman who has been caught lying, with screams of “You are misquoting me”, and “this is a mere distractions”.
Like I said before, you'd better apply for a job in the 0bozo regime. you'd fit in like a glove.
Chortle!
"For the umpteenth time, Android IS a product." This shows you are not arguing against what I wrote. You are arguing against a bastardized version of what I wrote that puts the emphasis on "IS" instead of "A." Remember, WORDS MEAN THINGS. You changed the entire meaning of the sentence from a comment on device manufacture to something that doesn't make any sense.
I chronologically listed all your pertaining previous posts in this thread.
Conveniently leaving out the post I responded to in an effort to remove the context. Answer me this simple question: That post I responded to. Was it referring to making 200,000 copies of the Android OS per day, or was it referring to making 200,000 smartphones per day? There's your context.
And when challenged, you DID declare that since you can't walk into a carrier's shop and buy Android, so therefore its not a product.
You quote me in relation to buying (and selling) Android:
"You (Post # 50): Nobody sells Android. The dozens of phones loaded with Android are products, and they are sold.Nowhere in there do I say the Android OS itself is not a product. I correctly say Android is not a product that you can buy at a store. Basic logic. If I say "A penguin is not a bird that can fly," I'm not saying it's not a bird, I'm saying it's a bird that can't fly. Duh. Only a hostile, dishonest reading can produce any other result.You (Post # 62) : “If you walk up to your carrier and say “I want to buy Android,” the salesman will help you choose a phone that runs Android. He will not hand over a product called “Android.”
I destroyed your “Android is not a product” mantra
That's your mantra. Keep fighting against yourself. I only said that what is manufactured at 200,000 per day is not *a* (notice the emphasis on *a* as in one single) product called Android, but several different devices (still products, but PLURAL) by several different manufacturers.
Do you dare to challenge that assertion? Do you dare to drop your strawman and argue against the point I actually made? Nah, you're too chicken to fight me. You have neither the brains nor balls to take me on straight. You can only put a picture of my face on your own and punch yourself repeatedly, bragging "Nya, nya I hit you" as you bleed more and more.
You literally have not addressed one point I ACTUALLY MADE. I am through with you on this subject until you gain that ability, and hopefully some semblance of honesty. Until then, keep arguing against yourself, preferably in private.