Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gay Marriage – Forgive Me, But What is the Problem Here?
The Constitution Club ^ | 08-05-10 | Angi Quinn

Posted on 08/05/2010 5:04:23 PM PDT by TheConservativeCitizen

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-163 next last
To: Screaming_Gerbil

That poor kid. Somebody filled her head with..........nothing.


61 posted on 08/05/2010 6:50:34 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: msrngtp2002; Jim Robinson

Same sex marriage is part and parcel of the LEFTIST homosexual agenda. You want same sex marriage and all the rest? You’re on the wrong forum.

JR - here’s another one if you want it.

FR is not a free-for-all where any and all leftist ideology is spewed. This is a CONSERVATIVE website. You are the flaming liberal who cannot stand conservative values presented as real and superior to leftist crap.


62 posted on 08/05/2010 6:58:15 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

Angi flunked freshman biology?
.


63 posted on 08/05/2010 6:59:16 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msrngtp2002; little jeremiah; Jim Robinson
So you are saying that everyone on FR MUST only espouse the opinions and ideas that YOU find acceptable.

Excuse me but this is an activist site and the info at that link was written by the OWNER of this site. It states what Free Republic believes in and stands for.

Statement by the founder of Free Republic

As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc.

This is what FR stands for. You don't like it, take it up with Jim Robinson.

64 posted on 08/05/2010 6:59:35 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TheBigIf

You want to marry your dog, or your horse?

Go for it, its legal now!
.


65 posted on 08/05/2010 7:01:19 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Actually amigo you are advocating for special rights for folks based on what their sexual proclivities. Nobody's rights are violated. Marriage has been defined as the union of one man and one woman for all time. Any man of age not directly related to a woman of age can marry that person, their sexual proclivities not withstanding.

What you advocate is giving special rights to a select group of people based on their sexual desires. My question is why? Can I get special rights based on my sexual desires and if I want to change the meaning of the word marriage can I define it to include a platonic contract with my grandchildren enabling them to collect my SS survivors benefits in perpetuity? I mean if you can change the meaning of the word based on one's sexual practices certainly you wouldn't mind changing it based on non sexual practices where a deep rooted love exists. Would you?

66 posted on 08/05/2010 7:02:34 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen
As for gay and lesbian marriage. What is wrong with it? Really.

The subject has been energetically and exhaustively covered in recent years. Where have YOU been in those years? Buried in Tora Bora with your nose up some goat's hindquarters?

Just wondering ...

67 posted on 08/05/2010 7:03:59 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: msrngtp2002

Please read the quotes from “gay” activists explaining the reasons for pushing same sex marriage.

It’s because they want to entirely change society, for one.


68 posted on 08/05/2010 7:05:57 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: msrngtp2002

Actually you were the one though who spouted crap in this thread.

You actually tried to claim that a Court precedent claiming that a person’s sexual behavior deserves special rights is ridiculous to be against or concerned about where such a precedent would lead.

There has never been a Court decision this outrageous and dangerous to society. What behaviors will be declared specially protected next? How many lawsuits will we see by the party of lawyers telling us what we have to believe?

Then you went on to take a knock at one of our Consitutional rights that is clearly written for all to see.

To act as if the Constitution prohibits Congress from legislating in regards to people’s sexual beahvior and how they display it in public and compare it to our right to bear arms is 100% left-wing crap.


69 posted on 08/05/2010 7:06:55 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: sourcery

“That which violates the rights of others may rightfully be prohibited. That which does not may not. That is the invariant, universal principle of Liberty that applies to everyone, everwhere, on all subjects, in all situations and contexts.”

.
That pile of excrement was thought up by a fool who is at war with his creator, and in rebellion against the natural laws of creation.

It is an invitation to an eternity of pain.
.


70 posted on 08/05/2010 7:10:20 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor; sourcery

sourcery wrote:

“That which violates the rights of others may rightfully be prohibited. That which does not may not. That is the invariant, universal principle of Liberty that applies to everyone, everwhere, on all subjects, in all situations and contexts.”

Actually this statement is a straight out re-write of the left-wing wiccan creed first stated by the man who caled himself the Beast, Aliester Crowley.

‘Do As Thou Wilt Shall Be the Whole of the Law’

The wiccans later re-wrote it:

‘An it harm none do what ye will. ‘

It is no wonder that this poster calls themself ‘sourcery’ and has now re-wrote (or copied an pasted) the Crowley/Wiccan creed in new wording to defend their lack of respect for morality and natural law.


71 posted on 08/05/2010 7:17:31 PM PDT by TheBigIf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen
As for gay and lesbian marriage. What is wrong with it? Really.

Because it is being used as a weapon to erode parental rights, freedom of association, freedom of speech and freedom of religion?

Because government stamp of approval on perverted behavior that is spread disease, depression and early death and leaves kids confused as to what is normal?

A real conservative wouldn't have to ask.

72 posted on 08/05/2010 7:26:55 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59
Marriage between man and animal?

Polygamy and then incestuous marriages.

73 posted on 08/05/2010 7:28:40 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: bvw
We all have our opinions about the morality of homosexuality, but the question was put to the voters of California to decide what constitutes a marriage. The majority said; one man, one woman. That is the way it is supposed to work in the US, contentious issues are decided by the people. That is the way it must work if we are to be a country of laws, not men; meaning we are not beholden to the will of one or a a few(think King). The people of California followed the law, followed the process, and changed their constitution. A clearly biased judge usurped their will and instituted his own. That isn't judicial activism, it is judicial tyranny.
74 posted on 08/05/2010 7:34:52 PM PDT by Old North State (Don't blame me, I voted for Pedro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: panaxanax; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; Antoninus; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

And one more for the road. The pro-homosexual agenda "freepers" are crawling out of the woodwork. Have at 'em, and read panaxanax's facts. No one can defeat them.

75 posted on 08/05/2010 7:39:35 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen
It is reasonable to expect that if thousands of years of tradition & custom can be tossed out the window by the gov’t, then there is no reason to believe this insanity will stop with gays or couples. If 2 men/women can marry, why not 3, or 4, or 10? How about 2 fags, 3 lesbos, 5 trannys, & a goat? If ANY group of “individuals” want to marry, why stop them, since marriage is now primarily just a tax & benefits distinction? Otherwise it is meaningless.

If say, 10 men, 20 women, & a bisexual male orangutan married each other, would there be tax advantages? Could the employer be forced to cover the vet bills for the ape under Obamacare? If the marriage dissolves, is the ape entitled to alimony? How would the spawn of this union be shared after a divorce?

These are just some of the questions that will have to be resolved in the near future. Perhaps judge Walker can answer these questions.

It's a good day to be a lawyer!

76 posted on 08/05/2010 7:42:03 PM PDT by Mister Da (The mark of a wise man is not what he knows, but what he knows he doesn't know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeCitizen

hey why can a man have 9 wives?
why can’t a father marry his 18 year old consenting daughter?
Hey why can’t kids now be told that they can have two daddies and see two men in bed together every morning, live with them, see them kiss, hug and then be tiold how two men can have sex with each other?

Are you nuts?

We’re talking about two men poking each other up the butt to get off sexually, you think about that hey and then they think because they get off like that they then should be married, have benefits etc
We’re talking about two women , one wearing a strap pretending to be a man while having sex and they think too they should be married, etc.

Yea can’t wait for my kids to be taught by law that two of the same sex fist each other.

ASTOUNDING

Think about it and what they actually do and then what they want because of what they do in the bedroom, public bathrooms, dog parks etc


77 posted on 08/05/2010 8:01:13 PM PDT by manc (WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine

how come we know that two room mates want benefits so they make up they’re married to get them.

This is all about a group of folks , how they get off sexually and then say they should be married, WTH


78 posted on 08/05/2010 8:02:38 PM PDT by manc (WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: manc

The sexual perversion pushers never stay to argue rationally since they cannot. They are emotion and whim driven. No sanity at all.


79 posted on 08/05/2010 8:04:10 PM PDT by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

yea she’s conservative, ARF


80 posted on 08/05/2010 8:05:19 PM PDT by manc (WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson