Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Maelstorm

“he problem we face today is that fringe sexuality has been given equal ground with heterosexual monogamy which is stupid and irrational but that is the world we live in. There is also no good reason to reward homosexuality.”

I’d like one person to attempt to rationally explain how any homosexual relationship is better than your average heterosexual relationship in terms of the state’s welfare. A heterosexual relationship produces children, ie the nation’s future, its tax base, its productivity, and it’s workforce.

A homosexual relationship produces? Well, nothing, other than some pretty entertaining hissy fits.

The two types of relationships are by no means equal. Why should the federal government reward an inferior lifestyle that produces nothing in the same way it rewards its future sustenance?

You can show me your castrated prize bull all day long, but I’m not going to pay you for it when there’s another one that’s going to produce prize calves because it’s fertile.


23 posted on 08/05/2010 6:53:55 PM PDT by CaspersGh0sts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: CaspersGh0sts

If you analyze it from a rational perspective accommodating a homosexual relationship is artificial and is dependent on govt for it to maintain any status at all. Gender is real and for real 100% sex you need two members one from each gender. We may call same gender relations sex but it really isn’t. Sex is an activity that could if both partners are fertile produce offspring. Homosexuals can not produce offspring with their same sex partners at least not without radical scientific intervention which is something we as a society will one day be asked to pay for just to be “equal”.

The alternative is to have a third party involved which only complicates and legal status and guardianship of offspring. All children who are not biologically connected to the parents are more likely to suffer abuse. I know we have seen several studies which were conducted for the sake of activism trying to norm homosexuality but there should be real questions about encouraging partnerships in a group where drug abuse, suicide, domestic violence, sexual disease, sexual abuse, mental disorder, and relationship instability is much higher. Add a child who has no biological relationship to one or both parents and you are setting up a very dangerous combination.

The very first male couple that was allowed to Foster children in the UK was found to have molested them. The social workers ignored signs in the form of lewd pictures which the men had been taking of the boys age 8 -15.
What gets me is the unreality of the way homosexuals are dealt with. They are given kid glove treatment and people refuse to apply even a fraction of the caution that known science and research should warrant.

Even conservatives are reluctant because the gay lobby is such a bully. Anyone who thinks this doesn’t affect them is living in a naive little bubble.


29 posted on 08/05/2010 7:13:26 PM PDT by Maelstorm (This country was not founded with the battle cry "give me liberty or give me a govt check!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: CaspersGh0sts
A heterosexual relationship produces children, ie the nation’s future, its tax base, its productivity, and it’s workforce.

Exactly, good post, as are many on this thread.

30 posted on 08/05/2010 7:20:13 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (We don't have a leader in the Oval Office, we have a reader in the Oval Office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson