Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SnakeDoctor
If we concede that government can define marriage, we’ve already lost.

Unfortunately, the idea of "defining marriage" as NOT being a compelling interest of the state is a position fraught with unintended idiocies that would make themselves apparent after the good intention is manifested.

However, please feel free to try to make a cogent case for why marriage should not be in the interest of the commonwealth.

5 posted on 08/06/2010 6:52:24 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (The success of Darwinism was accompanied by a decline in scientific integrity. - Dr. Wm R. Thompson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

>However, please feel free to try to make a cogent case for why marriage should not be in the interest of the commonwealth.

If the fact that the government can twist marriage to be whatever an unelected official wants it to be isn’t good enough cause for removal of government from the picture, then nothing is.


11 posted on 08/06/2010 7:13:01 AM PDT by drbuzzard (different league)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson