Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
When Palin agreed to endorse McCain, Hayworth was not in the race, and McCain's two opponents at that time were goofballs of the fringe order; neither was viable in a statewide race.

Since the visit last winter when she did endorse McCain, she has not appeared with him again. She has been to AZ and appeared with Jan Brewer, but not with McCain.

Endorsements do not necessarily indicate that you agree with someone's politics. An endorsement may mean you agree with their current opponent(s) less. Or it may be repayment of a debt.

But then you already know this, ...

32 posted on 08/09/2010 1:20:08 PM PDT by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: meadsjn
When Palin agreed to endorse McCain, Hayworth was not in the race, and McCain's two opponents at that time were goofballs of the fringe order; neither was viable in a statewide race.

Palin not only endorsed John on campaign swings, and by creating radio spots, she went on FoxNews to do it with John in person.

Hayworth has been in the race for months, and Sarah has been content to not only let that endorsement stand, but to continue to let the radio spots air over and over again in support of John McCain.

Sarah has had plenty of time to reflect on the Arizona race after having been pounded over the subject for months.  And Sarah has opted to leave her support behind the likes of John McCain, despite having been clued in to what a miserable politician he has been for our cause.

Palin hasn't got  a leg to stand on here.  She is either clueless, deaf to Conservatism, or just loves John enough to support him despite anything he has done or what anyone can say.

Since the visit last winter when she did endorse McCain, she has not appeared with him again. She has been to AZ and appeared with Jan Brewer, but not with McCain.

And her radio spots continue to hawk McCain over J. D. Hayworth.  Evidently she doesn't have a concience either.

Endorsements do not necessarily indicate that you agree with someone's politics. An endorsement may mean you agree with their current opponent(s) less. Or it may be repayment of a debt.

So you're going to go with she doesn't agree with him but is supporting him anyway, she disagrees with him less than J. D. Haywroth, or she has sold her views out to repay a debt.

And I'm supposed to consider such a person a sure fire safe bet against selling her beliefs out from the Oval Office?

But then you already know this,...

Yep, I already knew your position was indefensible.

34 posted on 08/09/2010 1:35:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Latest most accurate Az Poll to date, of 14 likely voters: McCain 137%, Hayworth -37% (+/- 92%))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson