Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Drumbeats For War Grow Louder
Personal Liberty Digest ^ | 8/9/2010 | Bob Livingston

Posted on 08/09/2010 7:21:59 AM PDT by IbJensen

Boom. Boom. Boom.

Can you hear it?

It’s the drumbeat for war. And it’s beating louder by the day.

Boom. Boom. Boom.

Eleven United States and one Israeli warships pass through the Suez Canal.

Boom. Boom. Boom.

Former CIA Chief Michael Hayden says a United States military strike against Iran “seems inexorable” because diplomacy is failing.

Boom. Boom. Boom.

Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Mike Mullen says the U.S. military has a plan to attack Iran.

Boom. Boom. Boom.

Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives last week introduced Resolution 1553 which would give Israel the go-ahead to attack Iran. The resolution grants support for Israel to “…confront nuclear threats posed by the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the use of military force…”

The neocons have never seen a war they couldn’t support, no matter the President’s party affiliation.

Boom. Boom. Boom.

The end is near—so President Barack Obama tells us—for former President George Bush’s incursion into Iraq. He said last week that America’s combat mission in Iraq will end by Aug. 31. But that doesn’t mean all troops will come home. There will still be 50,000 there as August turns into September. And it’s going to be 18 more months before they all come home… if he sticks to his timeline.

We can only hope 50,000 troops are enough to prevent that governmentless nation from descending further into chaos.

For those troops that do come home, it appears they will only be home long enough to change their underwear and restock their ammunition belts before heading off to another Mideast hellhole to die… for what?

To blow up suspected nuclear sites, even though a 2007 U.S National Intelligence Estimate said that Iran had halted work on developing a nuclear warhead in 2003. Meanwhile, an unclassified military report submitted to Congress in April concluded, “Iran is developing technological capabilities applicable to nuclear weapons and, at a minimum, is keeping the option to develop nuclear weapons,” as The Washington Post reported.

A May report by the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said Iran hasn’t sufficiently cooperated to allow the agency to determine if Iraq’s nuclear activities are solely for peaceful activities.

Conflicting stories of weapons of mass destruction: Haven’t we heard this before… during the lead up to the invasion of Iraq?

If HR 1553 were to pass and Israel does strike at Iran’s nuclear reactors and nuclear sites, what then? If Iran strikes back—which President Mahmoud Ahmadenijad has said they would—and is joined by Syria, Lebanon and Hezbollah, would the U.S. then be obligated to intervene?

It would seem so. And what would be the result of such a conflagration?

Obama has pledged America’s undying support of Israel no matter what… even if he did treat Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu badly during his visit to the White House earlier this year. And Israel maintains it is convinced that Iran is working to acquire nuclear weapons.

Much of the international community also seems convinced Iran is trying to build a nuclear weapon. The feckless U.N. Security Council has been trying to agree on sanctions against Iran for some time. China and Russia continue to hold out.

But aren’t Americans growing sick of war? Apparently the political class isn’t.

Nine years later we remain in Afghanistan, NATO allies are abandoning us and more and more of our troops are dying. Obama, with no clear-cut strategy to fight what he considers the good war, vows to continue fighting on, and any timelines he may mention mean little.

Seven years later we are still in Iraq, and at least a few thousand troops will remain there for the foreseeable future. Nineteen years later we’re still in Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, even though the first Persian Gulf War supposedly ended with a good outcome.

Sixty-four years later we still have troops stationed throughout Eastern Europe and in Japan. Fifty-seven years later we still have troops stationed in South Korea. That war has not ended—no official peace treaty ever signed—and there have even been some drumbeats sounding from there. Just not as loud… yet.

But the recent U.S.-South Korea joint air and sea military exercises in the Sea of Japan intended to send a message to a recalcitrant North Korea—who has been accused of torpedoing a South Korean ship—antagonized China. And who can blame them?

What would we think if China or Russia conducted military exercises in the Gulf of Mexico or off the coast of New York or San Francisco? Either Obama and the Pentagon were naive to the implications of conducting war games in the area, or they conducted them intending to raise tensions in the area.

Boom. Boom.

According to the think tank Foreign Policy In Focus, there were 865 Pentagon-confirmed U.S. troop base sites located off U.S. soil in 2009. But this number doesn’t include all of the bases being used in Iraq and Afghanistan—as many as 150 more.

There are 268 bases in Germany, 124 in Japan and 87 in Korea. Others are scattered around the globe in Aruba, Australia, Bulgaria, Bahrain, Colombia, Greece, Djibouti, Egypt, Qatar, Romania, Singapore and Cuba, to name just a few.

The bases are draining our economy of billions of dollars a year. Isn’t it time we ended Empire America? Isn’t it time we brought our troops home?

There would still be work for them to do. Our border with Mexico is under assault.

But the military-industrial complex might not be as happy about that. Stopping Mexican paramilitary units and drug cartel thugs isn’t as lucrative as dropping bunker busters on Iran and North Korea… and maybe China.

BOOM. BOOM. BOOM.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: barf; bildebergers; blogpimp; cinosonfr; drumsinthedeep; eldersofsion; evilregime; iran; obozoandwookie; paranoia; paultardsonparade; theyarecoming; trilateralcommission; troll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
Obama steers clear of North Korea and shoves Chinese money at the imams in America to build mosques around our nation. Now he sees the value of using a war that he won't let us win to hold our attention and complete of bankruptcy of America!
1 posted on 08/09/2010 7:22:01 AM PDT by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Former CIA Chief Michael Hayden says a United States military strike against Iran “seems inexorable” because diplomacy is failing.


Diplomacy is failing because the other side has no interest in diplomacy except as a means to keep the West off their back until their nuclear programs are completed.


2 posted on 08/09/2010 7:26:54 AM PDT by Personal Responsibility (The problem isn't that 1% of muslims are terrorists. The problem is 99% of terrorists are muslim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
"Boom. Boom. Boom."

Who wrote this? John Lee Hooker?

3 posted on 08/09/2010 7:28:28 AM PDT by Jaxter ("Pro Aris et Focis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

It’s not that there aren’t legitimate American interests in various parts of the globe. The problem is that we never go in to “win”.

We worry more about our image and our enemies casualties than ourselves.

I would die for my country, but not for some BS political excercise.


4 posted on 08/09/2010 7:28:41 AM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
a 2007 U.S National Intelligence Estimate said that Iran had halted work on developing a nuclear warhead in 2003

Wow - I didn't know anybody actually still believed that report.

5 posted on 08/09/2010 7:28:41 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter

Boom boom boom boom.
Gonna shoot you right down.
Right off a your feet.
Take you home with me.
Put you in my house.
Boom boom boom boom.
A-Haw Haw Haw Haw!
HEY HEY!

I love to see you strut
up and down the floor
When you talking to me,
that baby talk
I like it like that
Whoa, yeah!
Talk that talk, walk that walk

When she walk that walk,
and talk that talk,
and whisper in my ear,
tell me that you love me
I love that talk
When you talk like that,
you knocks me out,
right off of my feet
Hoo hoo hoo
Talk that talk, and walk that walk

by John Lee Hooker


6 posted on 08/09/2010 7:34:12 AM PDT by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

“inexorable”? Someone has been bitten by a Thesaurus.


7 posted on 08/09/2010 7:36:05 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter

Nah! John Lee’s lyrics are much better.


8 posted on 08/09/2010 7:37:24 AM PDT by rex regnum insanit (falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

So what’s Boom Boom’s advice in this article? End Empire America and kick Mexico’s butt? Then what? Nation build in Mexico? Put them all on the health care system? It’s the same old assumption that without troops overseas and the military industrial complex nobody will be mad at us or try to take advantage of us. Oh yeah and we won’t need anyone else because we built windmills or something? This seems to push the same old anti-war buttons without much of a serious plan about how to get there.


9 posted on 08/09/2010 7:37:29 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

Until such time as we face facts and understand that a victor will be crowned one way or another, then we are just being irrational. The end game is coming, and I fear, very soon.


10 posted on 08/09/2010 7:37:58 AM PDT by Shady (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Nothing like a military strike to stir-up some pro-American support for the President just before the mid-term elections. Another October surprise. Will the voters go for it? Just wondering...

Maybe this will be timed to go with the mortgage foregiveness/restructuring surprise as a way to buy some support for this flagging Administration.


11 posted on 08/09/2010 7:39:08 AM PDT by ReleaseTheHounds ("The problem with Socialism is that eventually you run out of other people's money." M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Never let democrats lead you into a war. Never.


12 posted on 08/09/2010 7:39:17 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

As long as its paid for.


13 posted on 08/09/2010 7:42:10 AM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
To blow up suspected nuclear sites, even though a 2007 U.S National Intelligence Estimate said that Iran had halted work on developing a nuclear warhead in 2003.

And you believe that, Mr. Livingston?

14 posted on 08/09/2010 7:42:47 AM PDT by sauropod (The truth shall make you free but first it will make you miserable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

But there’s a marxist mulsim apologist in the White House.

Fizzle. Fizzle. Fizzle.


15 posted on 08/09/2010 7:47:38 AM PDT by ConservativeWarrior (In last year's nests, there are no birds this year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
To blow up suspected nuclear sites, even though a 2007 U.S National Intelligence Estimate said that Iran had halted work on developing a nuclear warhead in 2003. And you believe that, Mr. Livingston?

Actually I believe that too but I also believe that right afterwards when they found out that we weren't coming for them next they started up the program again along with advanced IED development. And over in Libya Kadafy has to be kicking himself for being so gutless and turning over all his research.

16 posted on 08/09/2010 7:51:08 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jaxter

Yep, right outside the Soul Food Cafe.

“Best damn chicken in the state.”


17 posted on 08/09/2010 7:55:40 AM PDT by NOVACPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
No barf alert?

This is nothing but an anti-military liberal blog. Hardly news, much less breaking news.

18 posted on 08/09/2010 7:58:00 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Free Republic -- One stop shopping ....... It's the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

“This is nothing but an anti-military liberal blog. Hardly news, much less breaking news.”

Really. From the site (and my personal knowledge).

“Bob Livingston is an ultra-conservative American who has been writing a newsletter for 41 years.”

Perhaps a warmonger could make such a statement as yours, but a conservative wouldn’t.

Hank


19 posted on 08/09/2010 8:10:43 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

So why did we take out Iraq who was the enemy of Iran? FUBAR


20 posted on 08/09/2010 8:16:52 AM PDT by ex-snook ("Above all things, truth beareth away the victory")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson