What a shame Guiliani was not supported. HIs core values are important and he is consistent and makes decisions based on them. When it comes to the terrorist enemy, he’s a leader to admire. He was the only NY politician who refused to meet with vile terrorist Arafat when the latter visited New York. Compare that with craven Bloomberg’s pushing through a celebratory mosque at Ground Zero, in spite of the good sense of most of New York and the nation.
He also ran on a pledge to clear out the State Dept...saying “the era of Anti-Americanism in the State Dept will come to an end”.
And he has been campaigning for hard-core Conservatives since the late 80s, (in my state), he obviously was not hostile to conservative policies in the least if he campaigned for them.
Hopefully he will be an asset to a future conservative Republican President, or run again. It would be nice to have a ruthless SOB in office for a change.
I had no intention of getting into discussion on this any further than what I stated in my initial post, but NO it’s NOT a shame he wasn’t supported. He wasn’t the man for the job due his ideological perspectives on several important factors that cannot be denied, and I’m not going to continue this should any other reader wish to jump in as I haven’t any desire to get into a 20/20 hindsight, cudda, shudda discussion. Those sorts of discussions are worthless, and a waste of valuable time.