Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I'm Not Hiring
The Wall Street Journal ^ | AUGUST 9, 2010 | MICHAEL P. FLEISCHER

Posted on 08/10/2010 6:10:35 AM PDT by KeyLargo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: bluedressman

This says it all:

About Bogen

Bogen Communications International, Inc., the parent company of Bogen Communications, Inc. and Speech Design GmbH, is a leading provider of sound systems and telephone peripherals for commercial, industrial, and institutional applications the world over

“We are currently accepting resumes for the following position:

NO POSITIONS ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE.

http://www.bogen.com/aboutus/employment/

http://www.bogen.com/aboutus/aboutbogen/


21 posted on 08/10/2010 6:43:43 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo; StAntKnee; moder_ator

“Could use a warning that following the wsj link requires subscription.”

More than that, since the page is a pitch for PAID subscription, it amounts to solicitation, which I thought was banned around here. It ought to be.

Hank


22 posted on 08/10/2010 6:45:47 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

I would have loved to finish that story, too, but I’m not willing to subscribe just for one editorial.

This story provides a textbook illustration for why unemployment is so stubbornly high and will remain so. Government meddling in the labor market has made it just too damn expensive to hire anybody, even at minimum wage, and there’s no telling what new taxes, fees and costs Obummer will add later. Why get stuck with long-lasting unemployment and COBRA costs when you can just ship the job off to Indonesia?


23 posted on 08/10/2010 6:45:49 AM PDT by DNME (With the sound of distant drums ... something wicked this way comes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StAntKnee
Here's all of it.
24 posted on 08/10/2010 6:47:30 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze (A half-truth is a complete lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
When you add it all up, it costs $74,000 to put $44,000 in Sally's pocket and to give her $12,000 in benefits.

Ping for later

25 posted on 08/10/2010 6:49:41 AM PDT by Alex Murphy ("Posting news feeds, making eyes bleed, he's hated on seven continents")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo

>To offset tax increases and steepening rises in health >insurance premiums, my company needs sustainably higher >profits and sales—something unlikely in this “summer of >recovery.”

What he doesn’t see is that his customer base is hit with the same cost increases. More than likely he will see customer bankruptcies, longer days to pay, and increased costs from his suppliers.

Obamacare is a business and jobs killer.


26 posted on 08/10/2010 6:53:25 AM PDT by updatedscreenname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Is that $74,000 in addition to what he pays her or a total price for her labor including her wages?

No, that's $74,000 in direct costs for this woman as an employee: including employer-paid health care premiums, unemployment insurance, and employer-paid FICA taxes.

I read the article yesterday: I believe her "official" salary is $59,000 -- and she takes home $44,000.

27 posted on 08/10/2010 6:59:08 AM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Rumor is that Obama plans on “forgiving” debtors of Fannie And Freddie.

It was just a rumor, which has already been shot down by the White House. Of course, maybe it was a trial balloon.

This is supposed to be his GIFT to keep him in office.

When this originally came out, I opined that this would be his fastest ticket OUT of office. And Rasmussen appears to substantiate that:

58% Oppose Federal Mortgage Forgiveness Plan for Troubled Homeowners

Read the article. Only 28% favor such a proposal. And you can be almost certain that those are people that would be voting for Democrats anyway. Heck, less than half of Democrats think it would be a good idea.

The Political Class (click link and read toward the end for the definition) is the only group in which a majority think it's a good idea.

28 posted on 08/10/2010 7:06:44 AM PDT by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good WOMAN (Sgt. Kimberly Munley) with a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: updatedscreenname

And we have USA Today giving the Obama party line that there is nothing to worry about, companies will be hiring like crazy any day now - sarc.

This line is the best:

“Still, economists contend that the big productivity gains of recent quarters are actually harming the economy’s prospects for a sustainable rebound...”

Translation:

Obama demands that companies transform into private welfare programs by being less productive and hiring more people to do less.

USA TODAY

Worker
productivity
falls, could lead
to more hiring

Updated 55m ago

By Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics
Writer

http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2010-08-10-productivity-report_N.htm?csp=15


29 posted on 08/10/2010 7:07:17 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie
Her annual salary is $59K. Each employee pays a certain amount towards SS, Medicare, etc. for the FedGov. The employer must MATCH that contribution (out of their own pocket, above the annual salary). Then, there is the balance on the medical insurance being offered, plus any other benefits the company provides.

Yeah, it costs a LOT more to hire a person than just their base salary.

And every time the FedGov slaps another "mandatory" benefit onto a company, or closes the window on how many companies must comply, it costs even more. As a result, fewer people are employed - not more - because unlike the FedGov, businesses have to PRODUCE instead of just printing funny money.

30 posted on 08/10/2010 7:31:52 AM PDT by TheWriterTX (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KeyLargo
Having workers on your payroll in this economy is like playing rummy. You don't know when the game ends so you want to have the fewest cards in hand when it does.
31 posted on 08/10/2010 7:35:33 AM PDT by Niteranger68 (I believe in man-made political climate change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
NJ was the last state in the union that had neither a state income nor a state sales tax. The sales tax was initially 1%.

Then again if NJ didn't have the highest taxes in the country then we wouldn't be able to pay all of our government employees who work so hard (that's sarcasm by the way). I mean where else can cops earn 150k a year and then retire at age 45 and receive a starting pension of 65% of the average last 5 years salary plus medical for life.

32 posted on 08/10/2010 7:38:18 AM PDT by saneright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; FromLori; Gilbo_3; NFHale
Democrats solution to this problem?? Run that 74 K $ cost up to 100 K$ so she is completely unaffordable because that will somehow ‘stimulate’ our economy they say.

Don't the unions and socialists realize that they are destroying their future incomes and tax bases?

As one freeper said, I would tell them the story about killing the Golden Goose, but they would probably say the government will buy them another goose.

33 posted on 08/10/2010 7:50:03 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Lt. Col. Ralph Peters: Obama is the dog who caught the fire truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Rumor is that Obama plans on “forgiving” debtors of Fannie And Freddie. This is supposed to be his GIFT to keep him in office. He is the great Santa Claus!

Yea, giving away other people's money.

34 posted on 08/10/2010 7:50:32 AM PDT by Tamar1973 (Germans in 1932 thought they were voting for change too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

See, even the Dems believe in trickle down.


35 posted on 08/10/2010 7:56:06 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Latest most accurate Az Poll to date, of 14 likely voters: McCain 137%, Hayworth -37% (+/- 92%))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; FromLori; Gilbo_3; NFHale
Here is a "solution" to problem suggested in the American Spectator:

Link: Fleischer doesn't understand that he needs to wise up, figure out a way to call each new hire a "green job," and make nice with someone tight with the Obama administration (or in it). Then everything he's complaining about will be subsidized -- maybe for a whole year! Otherwise the unemployed "Sallys" of the world are out of luck.

36 posted on 08/10/2010 8:09:43 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Lt. Col. Ralph Peters: Obama is the dog who caught the fire truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

In their own peculiar way.


37 posted on 08/10/2010 8:11:40 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Lt. Col. Ralph Peters: Obama is the dog who caught the fire truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Tamar1973
Yea, giving away other people's money.

And he says Republicans don't have any new ideas? What is new about spending money?

38 posted on 08/10/2010 8:14:06 AM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Lt. Col. Ralph Peters: Obama is the dog who caught the fire truck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

Agreed. What will be interesting is watching them re-up the Bush tax cuts later this year. They’ll hate to have to do it after trashing them for years, but I don’t think they have the backbone to take the heat for letting them lapse.


39 posted on 08/10/2010 8:18:51 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Latest most accurate Az Poll to date, of 14 likely voters: McCain 137%, Hayworth -37% (+/- 92%))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; sickoflibs; FromLori; Gilbo_3; NFHale

” What will be interesting is watching them re-up the Bush tax cuts later this year. They’ll hate to have to do it after trashing them for years, but I don’t think they have the backbone to take the heat for letting them lapse. “

LOL! Even half of the DEMS know what will happen to the economy next year w/o the tax cuts, and they want to be re elected ;-)


40 posted on 08/10/2010 9:06:02 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (.Go troops! " Vote out RINOS. They screw you EVERY time" Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson