Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin
According to this judge's decision...Arizona's 15,000 lawmen could not help federal agents enforce the law... Based on this decision, do the states have the option of refusing to enforce federal law in general? It seems arbitrary to be to required to enforce federal law when it is convenient for Washington, while being denied the obligation to enforce federal law when it is to the states' advantage but contrary to Washington's political agenda. Either the states enforce federal law or they don't. Lawyers please advise.
9 posted on 08/10/2010 5:40:27 PM PDT by ArmyTeach ( When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty. (TJ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ArmyTeach

Not only should they not enforce Federal law, they should stop cooperating with all Federal agencies.


12 posted on 08/11/2010 3:02:38 AM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: ArmyTeach

I have thought the same thing.


14 posted on 08/11/2010 7:37:21 AM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson