Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin Supports Law of the Sea Treaty (Palin's Greatest Hits 2008)
AIPNews ^ | Oct 15, 2008 | Keith Porter

Posted on 08/10/2010 5:29:17 PM PDT by pissant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: pissant
I'm not up to speed on the LOST stuff, but in her letter she was trying to protect US rights to potential rights I guess. It wasn't like she was a globalist or a member of The Pentaverate
21 posted on 08/10/2010 5:43:59 PM PDT by GQuagmire (Coked-up stimulus monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

No, she’s not a raving globalist, best I can tell. But LOST is an evil that must never be visited upon our sovereignty.


22 posted on 08/10/2010 5:45:32 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
First LOST and now the sovereignty shredding ICC?

What's next--amnesty for illegal aliens?

23 posted on 08/10/2010 5:45:34 PM PDT by Czar (NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pissant

That three sentence article at the original link is sort of misleading when you read the letter Sarah Palin wrote at the link you provided in post #4.


24 posted on 08/10/2010 5:45:46 PM PDT by lovesdogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I would add that as a national figure, Palin may want to change her position on this.

Again, I would love to hear her, or anyone else, tell the UN and the international community to take a hike when it comes to US soveriegnty.


25 posted on 08/10/2010 5:45:55 PM PDT by camp_steveo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Czar

That water passed under the bridge long ago.


26 posted on 08/10/2010 5:46:15 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Now you’ve done it....do you have any idea how many freepers are rolling their eyes at this right now


27 posted on 08/10/2010 5:46:29 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; pissant
Still pissing into the wind, boys?

You should get a better shtick! This dog won't hunt for you, either! Your dogged determination is profoundly misguided and arbitrary. She is the leader in the race, without even running, and you can't stand to see her lead!


28 posted on 08/10/2010 5:47:16 PM PDT by WVKayaker (The object of oratory is not truth but persuasion. -Lord Thomas Babington Macaulay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: lovesdogs

“I’m writing to express my strong support for ratification” is hardly ambiguous.


29 posted on 08/10/2010 5:48:00 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pissant

LOST needs to get, well...lost. Our power lies in our complete naval superiority.


30 posted on 08/10/2010 5:48:44 PM PDT by khnyny (Worst US environmental disaster EVER - BP Oil Spill in the Gulf - Obama's Fault!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ak267
Obama's opinion isn't the most important here. The United States signed the 1994 Agreement on Implementation, but the Senate has not ratified the UN Convention. For me, this confirms what a bad idea it is:

On January 13, 2009, speaking at her Senate confirmation hearing as nominee for United States Secretary of State, Senator Hillary Clinton said that ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty would be a priority for her.

31 posted on 08/10/2010 5:50:48 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“It’s the notion that she’s the best we can do in 2012.”

The way I’m looking at the potential 2012 possibilities, the pickin’s are really slim. The R’s have NO presidential bench that is conservative with national stature, except maybe Palin.

The Bush guys spent eight years making sure that conservatives did not get out of primaries in Senate and Governor races. The result is the awful set of candidates for a year when R’s should be really competitive. It will, as a result, be very difficult to nominate an electable conservative in 2012. And, it will be very difficult to elect a non-conservative because of turnout issues.

The problem is: If you are a conservative, you have no national profile or you are damaged goods. If you have a national profile and may be electable, you are not a conservative.

I have my doubts about Palin as electable material. But compared to the other guys running, she looks pretty good.


32 posted on 08/10/2010 5:51:35 PM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pissant

The primaries in ‘12 will be more evenly conducted. I assume you will endorse her should she get the nomination?


33 posted on 08/10/2010 5:52:16 PM PDT by GQuagmire (Coked-up stimulus monkeys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GQuagmire

If she comes out foursquare against amnesty of any sort, I will.


34 posted on 08/10/2010 5:54:26 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: pissant

No, she’s not a raving globalist, best I can tell. But LOST is an evil that must never be visited upon our sovereignty.


No wonder she got the gig on MS Fox News

The LOST treaty is Globalism on Steroids! Palin gets worse by the day....my soverignity is not for sale to the UN


35 posted on 08/10/2010 5:54:39 PM PDT by UCFRoadWarrior (JD for Senate ..... jdforsenate.com. You either voting for JD, or voting for the Liberal...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker
She is the leader in the race, without even running, and you can't stand to see her lead!

Not really. It depends on the poll. Also with someone who is in the news ALL the time it is amazing that not only she leads by very little in some polls but she loses to other Republicans in other polls.

36 posted on 08/10/2010 5:56:25 PM PDT by jveritas (God bless our brave troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: WVKayaker

The LOST Treaty remains unsigned for a good reason. It is a bad Treaty for the United States.

I am quite sure Obama likes it.


37 posted on 08/10/2010 5:58:59 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior; rabscuttle

DeMint on Law of the Sea Treaty: Part 1

Sen. DeMint clarifies Ronald Reagan’s reasons for not signing the treaty and raises concerns of his own.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGr1zJfZhlo


38 posted on 08/10/2010 5:59:57 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I admit Sarah may have made a mistake when it came to LOST, but that doesn’t mean she’s evil or stupid or not conservative. After all, she’s only human, and we all make mistakes.


39 posted on 08/10/2010 6:01:48 PM PDT by Jacob Kell (For he is B. Hussein Obama, King of the RDDBs, and may all lesser RDDBs bow before him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: UCFRoadWarrior

(Duncan) Hunter has said that the United Nations is ineffective. He strongly opposes the Law of the Sea Treaty because he feels it helps the United Nations and contrasts with a precedent set by Ronald Reagan. In regards to the Treaty, Hunter stated, “Rest assured no treaty that infringes on the sovereignty of the United States, or further empowers the United Nations, will get anything but a trip to the waste basket in a Hunter Administration.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_positions_of_Duncan_Hunter


40 posted on 08/10/2010 6:02:54 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson