Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vatican US Child Sex Abuse Cases 'Falling Apart'
AFP via Google ^ | 8/10/10 | Karin Zeitvogel

Posted on 08/11/2010 1:02:35 PM PDT by marshmallow

WASHINGTON — A US lawyer who has successfully sued the US Roman Catholic church over the long-running child sex abuse scandal said cases against the Vatican are crumbling and he is throwing in the towel.

"You have to have an impossible alignment of planets and moons to win any case against the Vatican," attorney Bill McMurry told AFP a day after he asked a Kentucky court to dismiss a case to hold the Vatican accountable for all child sex abuse by Catholic clergy in the United States.

"It's out of my hands now. It's impossible to meet the burdens that the courts have placed on plaintiffs" who take on the Vatican, said McMurry, accusing the US judicial system of protecting the Holy See.

The Supreme Court has refused to review whether the Vatican is a sovereign state and therefore has broad legal immunity from prosecution over the sexual abuse of minors by priests in the United States.

"I was disappointed that our Supreme Court didn't correct this injustice, and I'm frustrated that I can't hold the Vatican accountable for what the Vatican did, but only for what the bishops did," said McMurry.

"Immunity allows international religious organizations masquerading as foreign countries to commit any horrendous act as long as they do it from a distance," he said.

McMurry filed a motion Monday with Louisville district court to dismiss a case against the Vatican filed by three men who claim they were sexually abused as boys by members of the Catholic clergy. One of the cases of alleged clergy sex abuse dates back to 1928.

The suit, filed in 2004, alleged that the Vatican had a policy of keeping secret any cases of clergy sex abuse.

In March, McMurry filed a motion in a Kentucky court to take sworn testimony from.................

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/11/2010 1:02:37 PM PDT by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Somebody call this man a Whaaaaaaambulance.


2 posted on 08/11/2010 1:31:40 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Counselor, what is this “Vatican” of which you speak?


3 posted on 08/11/2010 1:34:22 PM PDT by Oratam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

If he would go after public school teachers, he’d have an easier time of it.


4 posted on 08/11/2010 1:37:56 PM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
As repulsive as I find the crimes committed this man is just plain wrong. The Vatican is a sovereign State, period.

L

5 posted on 08/11/2010 1:40:47 PM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Translation: “There’s no big bucks in suing the Pope.”


6 posted on 08/11/2010 1:47:27 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

Taking shots at the Vatican is mostly about a plaintiffs’ lawyer trolling for new clients through media coverage. Almost all clerical abuse cases have been resolved by trial or settlement, leaving no claims to be pursued against the Vatican.


7 posted on 08/11/2010 1:53:10 PM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HIDEK6

Probably not. The public school system fiercely protects its child molesters. In NYC, they rarely even removed them from the classroom until it had happened several times, and then they would send them off to 110 Livingstone Street, the headquarters, where the child molesting teachers would sit around all day and draw full pay while the union refused to let anybody examine their records (protecting their privacy, don’t you know).


8 posted on 08/11/2010 1:56:38 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

“”Immunity allows international religious organizations masquerading as foreign countries to commit any horrendous act as long as they do it from a distance,” he said. “

Kinda like Mad MOHammed and his boys?

Hmmmmm....what religion was that now????

I know it’s on the tip of my tongue, but I just can’t bring myself to say it........ Is,,Is,,, Is,,,,,,lam?


9 posted on 08/11/2010 2:03:52 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: livius

I have a neighbor who is a retired public school teacher and principle. He is also a lapsed Catholic. Among other reasons for leaving the Church, he sited the “sex abuse scandal”. BREATHTAKING hypocrisy. I said nothing. He is impossible.


10 posted on 08/11/2010 2:08:18 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
A case from 1928 would be before the Vatican was an internationally-recognized sovereign state, I think (the treaty with Italy establishing Vatican City was in 1929). Of course earlier there had been the Papal States and the popes between 1870 and 1929 were not treated as subjects of the the king of Italy, I don't think.

Holding the Vatican responsible for the actions of a low-level priest in another country who was violating Catholic ethics by his conduct is a stretch. Was Lyndon Johnson ever put on trial for the My Lai massacre?

11 posted on 08/11/2010 2:40:38 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
Where this guy fouled his nest was in his request to get testimony or a deposition from Pope Benedict. He overreached big time, and fell flat on his ambulance-chasing butt.

Too bad, dude, better luck with that Accutane case.

12 posted on 08/11/2010 2:57:21 PM PDT by WarEagle (Can America survive a President named Hussein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow

I don’t believe 95% of these claims of abuse. The 1928 case is just one of many in which the supposed abuse took place.

Frankly, I think most of these claims are people thinking they’re going to cash in and ride free for life, and I’m glad they’re being refused.


13 posted on 08/11/2010 5:05:38 PM PDT by ElenaM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson