Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amtrak locomotive plan great idea
Erie Times-News ^ | August 12. 2010 | editorial

Posted on 08/12/2010 6:52:11 AM PDT by Willie Green

The federal government has the chance to rebuild the nation's passenger rail service by upgrading Amtrak's aging fleet of locomotives. We must seize that opportunity.

The idea is for Amtrak to secure loan guarantees under the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing program to revitalize its fleet with higher-speed, diesel-electric locomotives that would reach speeds between 110 and 124 mph. Up to $35 billion is available under the program, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation's website.

If it happens, GE Transportation, as the top locomotive manufacturer in the United States, would be poised perfectly to compete for the Amtrak contract.

The idea is good for Amtrak, good for GE Transportation, good for GE's 4,000 Erie employees, good for its 700 Grove City employees, good for GE's 250 suppliers in Pennsylvania alone and, most of all, this is a great idea for America's traveling public.

In recent days, the Erie Regional Chamber and Growth Partnership has led support of the plan, and they deserve credit for doing so. First Erie City Council stepped forward in support, followed by Erie County Executive Barry Grossman, County Council and Mayor Joe Sinnott.

The plan would give Amtrak's fleet better fuel efficiency, lower emissions and higher speed. GE Transportation has said the new locomotives would deliver an estimated fuel savings of 15 percent "and an emission reduction of approximately 60 percent" compared to the older locomotives still in service.

(Excerpt) Read more at goerie.com ...


TOPICS: US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: amtrak; bobbybaccalieri; boxcarwillie; choochoocharlie; diesel; dmu; trains
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
Go Erie!!!

It's certainly understandable why the Erie Times-News would be supportive of a proposal that would so favorably impact their local economy. Amtrak certainly has a need to upgrade its aging fleet, and there's no doubt that General Electric manufactures a high quality product that could possibly fill those needs.

However, GE's Locomotive products all appear to be traditional train engines that can be used for either passenger or freight... all the power is in the single engine which can pull dozens of attached cars behind it.
The disadvantage to this approach, especially with "short" trains, is that you waste fuel by having an overpowered engine pulling a much lighter load than what it's designed for.

For passenger service, a much more efficient design is the diesel multiple unit or DMU.
While DMUs are also capable of towing a couple of trailer cars, their engines are downized in power for greater fuel efficiency, and the engine unit itself is designed to also carry passengers.

To illustrate the difference, here is a YouTube showing operation of US Railcar DMU

IMHO, traditional Amtrak trains with GE engines are suitable for pulling long distance trains with many cars.
DMUs are more suitable for much more frequent and shorter, regional commuter service.

1 posted on 08/12/2010 6:52:14 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
The idea is good for Amtrak, good for GE Transportation, good for GE's 4,000 Erie employees, good for its 700 Grove City employees, good for GE's 250 suppliers in Pennsylvania alone and, most of all, this is a great idea for America's traveling public.

And really, really crappy for American taxpayers. But I see GE's Democratic grift campaign contributions are paying off.

So Willie, you are now reduced to being a lousy pimp for a corrupt corporation like GE. Your absurd choo-choo pimping has made you into a corporate shill.

Too funny.

2 posted on 08/12/2010 6:54:59 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
It's certainly understandable why the Erie Times-News would be supportive of a proposal that would so favorably impact their local economy.

The recipient of a thieves largess are almost always grateful. The victims of the thieves, not so much.

3 posted on 08/12/2010 6:57:17 AM PDT by Lurker (The avalanche has begun. The pebbles no longer have a vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

If they do it with their own money, I’ll light a sparkler and celebrate with them.

Other than that, it’s just more welfare.


4 posted on 08/12/2010 6:58:20 AM PDT by VanDeKoik (Iran doesnt have a 2nd admendment. Ya see how that turned out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

5 posted on 08/12/2010 6:59:31 AM PDT by wheresmyusa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanDeKoik
Caterpillar recently purchased Electro Motive Diesel, formerly part of GM. EMD 2 stroke diesel engines power trains and a few steamships on the Great Lakes.
6 posted on 08/12/2010 7:01:00 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

How about we build a, say thirty mile, circular track.

Then they can run their empty trains at whatever speed they want without screwing up the rest of us.

True, we’d have to pay for it in taxes, but we’d be forced to do so anyway, and they’d at least be out of sight and mine.

Typical RAT project: it doesn’t work, nobody wants it, and they demand more of it.


7 posted on 08/12/2010 7:01:22 AM PDT by benewton (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

GE has such a mouthfull of obama, they feel like they’re taking a crap.


8 posted on 08/12/2010 7:01:22 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wheresmyusa

Atlas Cried...................


9 posted on 08/12/2010 7:01:43 AM PDT by Red Badger (No, Obama's not the Antichrist. But he does have him in his MY FAVES.............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Wow, just wow! How much $$ has drained into the Amtrak money pit and now this! If Amtrak was capable of running an economically viable company they could have already done what the article talked about. Yet we continue to subsidize incompetence and mismanagement.


10 posted on 08/12/2010 7:04:35 AM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

I would rather see the revival of the old steam locomotives like the 4-8-4 Baldwins, the 4-6-6-4 Challengers.

Of course with a modern day powerplant in the drive gearing, but they would externally have the appearance of a steam engine, complete with some steam special effects.

I am of course a very avid fan of the Golden Years of steam and to some extent diesel, to me rail travel is the only way to get across country, you can meet other people, you don’t have to be in your seat for hours with a seatbelt on and I doubt you will have flight attendants going postal, which I support in that situation.

Air travel is gone with me, I have not flown out of Alaska since 2004 because its just too scary and intrusive.


11 posted on 08/12/2010 7:04:35 AM PDT by Eye of Unk ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act" G.Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

The problem with Amtrak, which I have ridden fairly extensively, is not its locomotives.

The problem is track condition, which higher speeds does not help, and on-time rates, which are atrocious. I’m not sure how shiny new locomotives will help with either of these.


12 posted on 08/12/2010 7:05:33 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

This is today's

Daily Willie Green Choo-Choo thread.

Promoting 19th Century technology for the 21st Century.

13 posted on 08/12/2010 7:06:04 AM PDT by Petruchio (I Think . . . Therefor I FReep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
The total cost would be Trillions to do it the right way. Not just the locomotives, but the entire train, the tracks, the the train stations. And it would still fail because people don't like sitting next to strangers when they travel, especially when they are afraid that some stranger might blow up the train or the tracks or the train station. And who wants to be in a train going 140 mph when it passes another train going the opposite direction at 40 mph that's carrying nuclear waste or deadly chemicals?
14 posted on 08/12/2010 7:06:10 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Willie has become something of a pleasure to debate a bygone idea with. Discussing passenger trains is akin to discussing the best buffalo gun makers.

Was the Sharps really the best?

Can passenger trains compete?


15 posted on 08/12/2010 7:07:03 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

GE units are crap. GE never has made a good, reliable, easy to fix in the field, smooth riding locomotive. Since GE and the democrats are joined at the hip they will get the contract.


16 posted on 08/12/2010 7:08:45 AM PDT by engrpat (A village in Kenya is missing their idiot...lets send him back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Why not rebuild what they have?

A new lease on life for older locomotives It’s more than an upgrade. It’s an extreme makeover for older locomotives. Modernization revitalizes aging locomotives while delivering better performance, higher reliability and lower operating expenses—all at a fraction of the cost of new power. In the most comprehensive modernizations, everything from behind the operator’s cab to the end of the chassis is removed, and a new modernization kit is dropped into place and integrated into the old locomotive platform. Packages are available for locomotives from GE, Lugansk and EMD*.

Who's going to finance this? Wall Street?

Why continue to use Diesel fuel? Shirley there is a sustainable green way to run 200 yr old technology these days, or do your 0bama masters keep you slaving away on the old technology?.

17 posted on 08/12/2010 7:09:20 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
http://www.denverpost.com/usnews/ci_15742910

Horrible train wreck sends most passengers to hospital 24 hours after federal train inspection.

18 posted on 08/12/2010 7:12:35 AM PDT by mountainlion (concerned conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petruchio
LOL...the thing is, it's not merely a technological obstacle...it's a sociological one. We have widespread, affordable individual transportation; why would people give that up to go back to a more primitive shared form of transport? The answer is, of course, that they won't...unless they are forced to do so at gunpoint. Which is not beyond the current administration...but that's another issue.
19 posted on 08/12/2010 7:12:41 AM PDT by B Knotts (Just another Tenther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Who knew passenger train travel was a growth industry? Shoosh, our financial worries are over. Yeah!!!


20 posted on 08/12/2010 7:19:03 AM PDT by equalitybeforethelaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson