Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Obama's Passport Shown on YouTube
YouTube ^ | Aug 13, 2010

Posted on 08/16/2010 7:09:21 AM PDT by LorenC

Last week on the White House's YouTube channel, they answered a question from the mailbag and showed this:

Date of Birth: 04 Aug 1961
Place of Birth: Hawaii, U.S.A.

So what do you expect the conspiratorial response to this will be? That it's a fake passport? That the U.S. Passport office is in on the conspiracy? That YouTube videos aren't admissible in court, and thus this should simply be ignored and not acknowledged as evidence at all? That there's not an uninterrupted shot of the trip advisor unlocking the safe, taking out the folder, and pulling out and opening the passport, and thus they aren't convinced that the passport seen was actually in the folder?

Or maybe just a mix of all of the above, plus whatever other special pleading they can think of.

Full YouTube video


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthers; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; obama; passport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-322 next last
To: Tex-Con-Man

No Little League I know lets you get away with posting redacted jpgs on a website.


101 posted on 08/16/2010 12:15:43 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: mlo

It’s not a matter of doing it over. Much of the information proving Obama is a fraud only surfaced after the election. The timing doesn’t relieve Obama of a positive burden to prove his eligibility.


102 posted on 08/16/2010 12:17:57 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: LorenC

A bizarre thing to show on YouTube.


103 posted on 08/16/2010 12:20:59 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

A bizarre thing to show on YouTube.


Obviously you didn’t watch the whole video to get the proper context. The passport was shown in response to a question about it from a YOUTUBE viewer.


104 posted on 08/16/2010 12:39:37 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

Haven’t there been tons of questions about his original birth certificate on YOUTUBE??


105 posted on 08/16/2010 12:42:27 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: lucysmom

IN SUMMARY, it could be very well possible, that Obama obtained his first passport by lying and in those day there a birth cert was not required, and he has been reissued a passport all these years...
A bc was, indeed, required to get a passport back in the old days when I got mine.


Exactly right. There was never a time in the 20th Century when you could get a passport without a birth certificate. However I got my first one with a short form copy that is even more brief that Obama’s short form.


106 posted on 08/16/2010 12:43:58 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

You’re kidding, right?


107 posted on 08/16/2010 12:49:55 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

You’re kidding, right?


Nope.


108 posted on 08/16/2010 12:59:35 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: edge919

Haven’t there been tons of questions about his original birth certificate on YOUTUBE??


YOUTUBE is a big place in cyberspace. It looks like the appropriate place would be the White House’s youtube channel. But I’m betting that what you’re likely to get is a referral to the short form COLB over at “Fight the Smears.”


109 posted on 08/16/2010 1:01:55 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

So you’re thinking a June 2007 abstract IS Obama’s ‘original’ birth certificate. You might be right. He may not have had a birth record prior to that.


110 posted on 08/16/2010 1:03:54 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: edge919

So you’re thinking a June 2007 abstract IS Obama’s ‘original’ birth certificate. You might be right. He may not have had a birth record prior to that.


I said nothing of the sort.
June 2007 is the date of the latest request for a Certification of Live Birth. But that abstract is good to go for all official US governmmental purposes as long as it meets the standards established by The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, Section 7211, which mandated minimum standards for birth certificates acceptable for federal purposes.

The statute defines a “birth certificate” as follows:
(a) DEFINITION- In this section, the term `birth certificate’ means a certificate of birth–
(1) for an individual (regardless of where born)–
(A) who is a citizen or national of the United States at birth; and
(B) whose birth is registered in the United States; and
(2) that–
(A) is issued by a Federal, State, or local government agency or authorized custodian of record and produced from birth records maintained by such agency or custodian of record; or
(B) is an authenticated copy, issued by a Federal, State, or local government agency or authorized custodian of record, of an original certificate of birth issued by such agency or custodian of record.
The Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act specifically mandates three categories of minimum standards for vital registration, including standards on (1) the certification of birth certificates and the use of safety paper, (2) proof and verification of identity as a condition of issuance of a birth certificate, and (3) processing of birth certificate applications to prevent fraud.
It will be interesting to see if Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin is granted discovery or subpoena power for Obama’s “birth certificate” and whether the state of Hawaii sends a COLB or a fascimile of the original. I can’t wait!


111 posted on 08/16/2010 1:18:06 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: jamese777

You have a knack for trying to baffle your way out of a question with volume rather than directly addressing the point. The subject is Obama’s ORIGINAL birth certificate, not what passes for a legal birth certificate. You said they would refer any questions about the ORIGINAL to an alleged June 2007 abstract. Either you think he has no other birth certificate prior to June 2007 or you know that it would be a deflection to refer anyone asking about the ORIGINAL to look at the jpg on the FTS site. Do you understand now??


112 posted on 08/16/2010 1:25:36 PM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: jrd
There are two questions that directly relate to the constitutional qualifications. Where was he born? In this matter he is yet to release his original birth certificate, as McCain did within 24 hours of being asked. In fact, he has engaged in guilty behavior by refusing to produce the document and fighting doing so in various courts.

Secondly, a USSC decision is needed to clarify the meaning of "natural born citizen." Until, either of these are satisfied, he is alleged to have committed one of the biggest frauds in the history of the world.

113 posted on 08/16/2010 1:31:13 PM PDT by whence911 (Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edge919
The subject is Obama’s ORIGINAL birth certificate, not what passes for a legal birth certificate.

When it comes to proving eligibility, all that matters is whether it is legal, not whether it is the original.

In many states, the registrar keeps the original and only abstracts can be requested and distributed. Does it matter? Not to any court, Federal agency, or sane people in general. But it does matter to birthers, who obviously can't be counted in the last group.

114 posted on 08/16/2010 1:33:20 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: whence911
Where was he born? In this matter he is yet to release his original birth certificate, as McCain did within 24 hours of being asked.

McCain never released his birth certificate to the public. And no, that image on the internet you think is his BC isn't. His lawyers explicitly denied its authenticity.

On the other hand, Obama allowed photos to be taken of his certification of live birth, and for those photos to be made publicly available. Contrary to birther myth, this COLB is just as good as an original birth certificate for the purpose of proving place of birth.

In fact, he has engaged in guilty behavior by refusing to produce the document and fighting doing so in various courts.

He has done nothing of the sort. He produced a document suffices to prove his place of birth. That you are not satisfied with the document is not his concern.

115 posted on 08/16/2010 1:36:50 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: curiosity
Nothing is "just as good as." That you ARE satif=sfied is very troubling.

If you are correct, I stand corrected on McCain. I saw a post here last year, that's what I recalled.

The rest is mere piddle. Until he shows the original and we have a court ruling, your blowing smoke for him.

116 posted on 08/16/2010 1:41:03 PM PDT by whence911 (Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: edge919

You have a knack for trying to baffle your way out of a question with volume rather than directly addressing the point. The subject is Obama’s ORIGINAL birth certificate, not what passes for a legal birth certificate. You said they would refer any questions about the ORIGINAL to an alleged June 2007 abstract. Either you think he has no other birth certificate prior to June 2007 or you know that it would be a deflection to refer anyone asking about the ORIGINAL to look at the jpg on the FTS site. Do you understand now??


OK, I follow what you’re trying to say now. I apologize for in advance for answering a question with a question but I hope you’ll get my point.

In light of the fact that officials of the state of Hawaii from the Governor to the Attorney General to the Director ot Health to the Registrar of Vital Statistics to the Director of Communications for the state Health Department have gone out of their way to verify and authenticate that Obama’s birth in Hawaii occurred on August 4, 1961, do you believe that a long form birth certificate for Barack Hussein Obama II released by the state of Hawaii under Obama’s authority will be a valid and true representation of the facts of his birth?


117 posted on 08/16/2010 1:47:47 PM PDT by jamese777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: edge919
"It’s not a matter of doing it over. Much of the information proving Obama is a fraud only surfaced after the election. The timing doesn’t relieve Obama of a positive burden to prove his eligibility."

He has no such obligation. Not a legal one anyway. The timing does matter because the election is over. The electors voted, the Congress certified it and Obama was sworn in. It's done.

And let's not forget that any positive obligation he had prior to all that, he met. He was after all listed on every ballot, and won. So I don't know what obligation is imagined that he failed to meet.

118 posted on 08/16/2010 1:48:18 PM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: whence911
Nothing is "just as good as."

The courts, the state of Hawaii, and every Federal agency that requires proof of citizenship disagree.

119 posted on 08/16/2010 1:53:24 PM PDT by curiosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: curiosity

You either see the original or you don’t. I don’t give a rat’s a— who disagrees. By your comment, I take it that Hawaii hasn’t seen the original. Interesting.


120 posted on 08/16/2010 2:00:08 PM PDT by whence911 (Here illegally? Go home. Get in line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 321-322 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson