He presented an alleged birth document that couldn’t be verified. Posting it acknowledged there was a positive burden of proof on him, but posting one that couldn’t be verified was a matter of going through the motions. Why bother if you can’t stand behind what you present and make the effort to prove it’s genuine?? So again, it’s not a matter of doing it over, but doing it right. Why is it such a nuisance for Obamapologists that anyone would expect full disclosure??
The point of having a birth certificate is that it is the verification.
"Posting it acknowledged there was a positive burden of proof on him..."
Absurd. Posting it was a response to a question during the campaign. It had nothing to do with a positive legal obligation.