Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House says Afghan deadline 'non-negotiable'
AFP on Yahoo ^ | 8/16/10 | AFP

Posted on 08/16/2010 11:04:22 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

MILWAUKEE, Wisconsin (AFP) – The White House said Monday that July 2011 was a "non-negotiable" deadline for starting a US withdrawal from Afghanistan, while insisting that President Barack Obama and his top general in Kabul were on the same page.

The White House was quizzed about a seeming disconnect between the two after General David Petraeus said in an interview aired Sunday that he could seek a delay in the troop drawdown if conditions on the ground required it.

"I think the president has been quite clear in explaining that it's a process, not an event, and that it's conditions-based," he told NBC television's "Meet the Press" program.

"The president and I sat down in the Oval Office and he expressed very clearly that what he wants from me is my best professional military advice."

But White House spokesman Bill Burton, speaking to reporters traveling on Obama's plane to Milwaukee, said the general's remarks had been taken out of context.

"I think that that is a very thinly sliced parsing of what he had to say. He said very specifically that that deadline stands and there is no daylight between the president or his commanders on the ground when it comes to July 2011," Burton said.

"As you saw with Iraq, when the president makes a commitment, he keeps it. And he intends to do that here as well," he said.

"Obviously the scope and rate of withdrawal will be conditions-based, but the date is not negotiable," Burton added.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghan; deadline; nonnegotiable; whitehouse
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: NormsRevenge

Words fail me.


21 posted on 08/16/2010 11:34:32 AM PDT by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
How long will it be before Petraeus is thrown under the bus?

Not sure Obama has a bus big enough for that task.

22 posted on 08/16/2010 11:38:41 AM PDT by beebuster2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Squantos; Gilbo_3; NFHale
Yeah... let's see just how negotiable everything is after November of this year. :-) ...maybe sooner! But we hope not. :-)
23 posted on 08/16/2010 11:40:49 AM PDT by hiredhand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
"With the premature withdrawal from Iraq"

I thought he was following the timetable of the Status of Forces Agreement with Iraq that Bush signed?

24 posted on 08/16/2010 11:41:11 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Putting Petraeus in his place!!!

Doormat!


25 posted on 08/16/2010 11:41:17 AM PDT by Carley (For those who fought for it, freedom has a flavor the protected will never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

“Under no circumstances will we delay our surrender.”


26 posted on 08/16/2010 11:44:04 AM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“How long will it be before Petraeus is thrown under the bus?”

My guess is sometime next May. Then Obama can say that his Petraeus’ strategy failed and we are pulling out the troops starting in July.

Of course Petraeus was a Bush person so this fits into the narrative very nicely.


27 posted on 08/16/2010 11:44:43 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Helter Skelter. The Revolution is Upon Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Well, maybe it’s negotiable with Ahmadinejad at the upcoming meeting. It’s just not negotiable with the Iraqis, Congress (especially the so-called right half of it), or the American people.


28 posted on 08/16/2010 11:55:07 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
“How long will it be before Petraeus is thrown under the bus?”

The real question is this:

'How long before Petraeus realizes what a scumbag OBAMA is?'

29 posted on 08/16/2010 12:10:22 PM PDT by wmileo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hiredhand
unfortunately, i dont have much 'hope' for any real 'change' this november...prayin that im wrong, but the fact that weve allowed rampant corruption w/o forcing the criminals to honor our electoral process, i think has only served to embolden them to go for broke this time around...

again, prayers that im wrong, but i forsee our 'betters' in the rin-o-p demanding that WE negotiate for the size of our own cattlecars come dec...

30 posted on 08/16/2010 1:09:08 PM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin

If I remember right, the withdrawal date was on the condition that the Iraqis would be able to take over and would not need us. The Iraqis are nowhere near ready. It’s still too soon to wtihdraw.

All those soldiers who fought and died. Probably in vain.


31 posted on 08/16/2010 1:37:20 PM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: fatnotlazy
There is a provision in SOFA that allows Iraq to delay the timetable, but the US can't delay it.

It is all murky there as to what will happen, but Sadr and Chalabi have the votes to determine the prime minister and they will give those votes to whichever contender takes the strongest anti-west position.

Keep in mind that when the NeoCons invaded Iraq, Chalabi was the man they planned to put on the throne.

32 posted on 08/16/2010 3:17:25 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gilbo_3
After November, this nation has two more years of extreme suckage to suffer through. But that's a best case, utopian version. The reality is that most likely, NOTHING will get done, or undone between November of this year and the ousting of PeeBo and that is most definitely a bad thing when our economy is still sliding into the bottomless crapper. Status quo is exactly what we DON'T need.

Also (and I hate to go on about this), but it's going to suck so bad in 2012 that conservatives will be demonized by the media for preventing any "progress" between now and then, and the demo-pricks will leverage this just as much as they can through the MSM. By that time, people will forget about what's happening right now and be mad at conservatives again for being cold and heartless to the masses of poor, unemployed people. Sheep have very short memories.

The logical thing to do is to start fire bombing MSM offices. But there are moral and legal implications, so I don't recommend it. :-)
33 posted on 08/17/2010 8:57:37 AM PDT by hiredhand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson