[Lurking Libertarian]

Have you even taken the time to read one page of Dr. Taitz’ motions? How do you know the “clerks” in the Supreme Court are not guilty of altering records?

You never see anything from the Supreme Court with an ink signature from a Justice-- not in Orly's case, not in any case. All you ever get is a letter from the Clerk of the Court (who is a permanent official, not a Justice's law clerk-- Orly seems to be confused between the two positions), saying that the Court denied a motion or denied certiorari.

[butterdezillion]

Wouldn’t that have been pretty easy for a law clerk to simply explain to somebody who asked why there was no signature?

Do you have some examples of this that you could show?